Which returned more over the last year, NAUG or QQQM?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NAUG returned +14.5% and QQQM returned +23.0%, so QQQM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, NAUG or QQQM?

NAUG charges 0.79% a year and QQQM charges 0.15%, so QQQM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Are NAUG and QQQM the same kind of fund?

No. NAUG is a buffer ETF and QQQM is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

NAUG vs QQQM: how they differ

Over the year QQQM returned more, +23.0% against +14.5%, and QQQM charges 0.15% against 0.79%.

Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - Aug and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF.

NAUG and QQQM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	NAUG Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - Aug	QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Where it sits	Buffer ETF	Core index fund
Issuer	Innovator	Invesco
What it is	Defined outcome, 15% on QQQ	Nasdaq-100
Total return, 1 year	+14.5%	+23.0%
S&P 500 over the same days	+23.0%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−8.4 pts	+5.5 pts
Expense ratio	0.79%	0.15%
Holdings	not filed	106

NAUG in plain words

From its price on Sep 13, 2026, the fund can gain about 16.4% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 2.8% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, QQQ can fall 3.8% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's QQQ level. 323 days remained on Sep 13, 2026. On Jul 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

QQQM in plain words

QQQM is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 106 positions, with the top ten at 47.1%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, NAUG or QQQM?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NAUG returned +14.5% and QQQM returned +23.0%, so QQQM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, NAUG or QQQM?: NAUG charges 0.79% a year and QQQM charges 0.15%, so QQQM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are NAUG and QQQM the same kind of fund?: No. NAUG is a buffer ETF and QQQM is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

NAUG against QQQM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, NAUG against QQQM, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/naug-vs-qqqm Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources