Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

NMAY vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, NMAY returned +9.7% to QQQM's +15.2%, and QQQM charges 0.15% to NMAY's 0.79%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about NMAY and QQQM

Net assets: $55m on Oct 28, 2026 for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - May, and $110.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF.

At a glance
+9.7%
NMAY total return, 1 year
+15.2%
QQQM total return, 1 year
0.79%
NMAY expense ratio
0.15%
QQQM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

QQQM costs 0.64 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.5 points; QQQM is far larger, $110.4bn against $55m.

NMAY vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureNMAYQQQM
Return
Total return, 1 year+9.7%+15.2%
Drawdown
Below its high4.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Index fall to the buffer7.9%
Fund price fall to the buffer6.0%
Benchmark
What it tracksQQQNasdaq-100 Index
The outcome period
Room to the cap9.4%
Buffer left, in index points15.0% of 15.0%
Days left in the period184
Period endsApr 30, 2027
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.79%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$55m$110.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight96%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund46.7%

Method

Side by side

NMAY Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - May QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Where it sits Buffer ETF Stock ETF
What it is Defined outcome, 15% on QQQ Tracks the Nasdaq-100
Total return, 1 year +9.7% +15.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.6% (QQQ) +15.2% (QQQ)
Gap to its benchmark −4.9 pts vs QQQ 0.0 pts vs QQQ
Expense ratio 0.79% 0.15%
Holdings not read by ETFIQ 105
Net assets, NMAY as of Oct 28, 2026 and QQQM as of Oct 27, 2026 $55m $110.4bn

NMAY and QQQM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

NMAY and QQQM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
NMAY

From its price on Oct 28, 2026, the fund can gain about 9.4% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 6.0% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, QQQ can fall 7.9% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's QQQ level. 184 days remained on Oct 28, 2026. On Apr 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

QQQM

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are NMAY and QQQM in the same category?
NMAY is a buffer ETF and QQQM is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, NMAY or QQQM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NMAY returned +9.7% and QQQM +15.2%.
Which is cheaper, NMAY or QQQM?
QQQM is cheaper, by 0.64 percentage points a year. That is about $64 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, NMAY against QQQM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nmay-vs-qqqm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.