Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MUB vs VT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MUB returned −0.4% to VT's +13.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MUB and VT

Net assets: $54.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares National Muni Bond ETF, and $81.8bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total World Stock Index ETF.

At a glance
−0.4%
MUB total return, 1 year
+13.5%
VT total return, 1 year
0.05%
MUB expense ratio
0.06%
VT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MUB costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 13.9 points; VT is 1.8 times larger.

MUB vs VT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMUBVT
Return
Total return, 1 year−0.4%+13.5%
Benchmark
What it tracksICE AMT-Free US National Municipal IndexFTSE Global All Cap Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.05%0.06%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$46.6bn$81.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight55%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund22.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jul 3, 2008 to Oct 23, 2026 · 955 weekly returns
MUB VT
Return
Total return edge VT +71.9% +371.6%
Annualized edge VT +3.0% +8.8%
Price return edge VT +3.9% +221.4%
Risk
Volatility edge MUB 6.4% 18.3%
Max drawdown edge MUB −12.4% −48.3%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VT 0.27 0.48
Sortino edge VT 0.37 0.66
Calmar edge MUB 0.24 0.18
Reading

VT returned more: +371.6% to +71.9%. MUB swung less: 6.4% to 18.3%. MUB fell less at its worst: −12.4% to −48.3%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: MUB vs VT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMUBVTEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+71.9%+371.6%VTPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+3.0%+8.8%VTTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+3.9%+221.4%VTPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility6.4%18.3%MUBSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation4.6%13.1%MUBLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−12.4%−48.3%MUBDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.270.48VTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.370.66VTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.240.18MUBAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 955 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MUB and VT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MUB VT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MUB
UNIVERSITY TEX UNIV REVS 0.16%
SAN ANTONIO TEX WTR REV 0.13%
NEW YORK ST TWY AUTH ST PERS I 0.12%
NORTHWEST TEX INDPT SCH DIST 0.12%
OKLAHOMA TRANSN AUTH OK F/K/A 0.12%
HOUSTON TEX HIGHER ED FIN CORP 0.11%
NEW JERSEY ST 0.11%
OHIO ST UNIV GEN RCPTS 0.11%
Only in VT
NVIDIA Corp 4.54%
Apple Inc 4.11%
Microsoft Corp 3.25%
Amazon.com Inc 2.06%
Alphabet Inc 1.73%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 1.62%
Broadcom Inc 1.39%
Meta Platforms Inc 1.36%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF VT Vanguard Total World Stock Index ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of National Muni Bond Tracks an index of Total World Stock
Total return, 1 year −0.4% +13.5%
Expense ratio 0.05% 0.06%
Holdings 7873 10194
Net assets, MUB as of Oct 27, 2026 and VT as of Sep 30, 2026 $54.1bn $81.8bn

MUB and VT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-106A2A1405

MUB and VT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. MUB follows ICE AMT-Free US National Municipal Index and VT follows FTSE Global All Cap Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 MUB returned −0.4% and VT +13.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 13.9 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

MUB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MUB

MUB tracks an index of National Muni Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year.

VT

VT tracks an index of Total World Stock. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10,194 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MUB or VT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned −0.4% and VT +13.5%.
Which is cheaper, MUB or VT?
MUB is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MUB against VT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mub-vs-vt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.