Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
MUB vs VLUE: how they differ
MUB and VLUE hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VLUE returned more over the year.
iShares National Muni Bond ETF and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MUB and VLUE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in MUB | Only in VLUE |
|---|---|
| HOUSTON TEX HIGHER ED FIN CORP 0.13% | MICRON TECHNOLOGY 21.65% |
| DISTRICT COLUMBIA UNIV REV 0.10% | CISCO SYSTEMS INC 4.14% |
| ECTOR CNTY TEX 0.08% | GENERAL MOTORS 3.72% |
| NEW ORLEANS LA 0.08% | VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC 3.05% |
| PORT TACOMA WASH REV 0.08% | AT&T 2.69% |
| CONTRA COSTA CALIF CMNTY COLLE 0.06% | BANK OF AMERICA 2.15% |
| LOS ANGELES CALIF 0.06% | FORD MOTOR CO 1.94% |
| LOS ANGELES CNTY CALIF 0.06% | COMCAST CLASS A 1.79% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF | VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | National Muni Bond | MSCI USA Value Factor |
| Total return, 1 year | +0.1% | +69.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −17.4 pts | +51.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.05% | 0.15% |
| Holdings | 5215 | 148 |
MUB in plain words
MUB is a bond fund tracking the National Muni Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VLUE in plain words
VLUE is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Value Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +69.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 148 positions, with the top ten at 44.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MUB or VLUE?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned +0.1% and VLUE returned +69.4%, so VLUE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, MUB or VLUE?
- MUB charges 0.05% a year and VLUE charges 0.15%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MUB against VLUE, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mub-vs-vlue Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources