Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MUB vs NOBL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MUB returned −0.4% to NOBL's +15.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MUB and NOBL

Net assets: $54.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares National Muni Bond ETF, and $11.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.

At a glance
−0.4%
MUB total return, 1 year
+15.5%
NOBL total return, 1 year
0.05%
MUB expense ratio
0.35%
NOBL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MUB costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 15.9 points; MUB is 4.6 times larger.

MUB vs NOBL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMUBNOBL
Return
Total return, 1 year−0.4%+15.5%
Benchmark
What it tracksICE AMT-Free US National Municipal IndexS&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.05%0.35%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$54.1bn$11.7bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight98%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund17.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MUB and NOBL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MUB NOBL
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MUB
UNIVERSITY TEX UNIV REVS 0.16%
SAN ANTONIO TEX WTR REV 0.13%
NEW YORK ST TWY AUTH ST PERS I 0.12%
NORTHWEST TEX INDPT SCH DIST 0.12%
OKLAHOMA TRANSN AUTH OK F/K/A 0.12%
HOUSTON TEX HIGHER ED FIN CORP 0.11%
NEW JERSEY ST 0.11%
OHIO ST UNIV GEN RCPTS 0.11%
Only in NOBL
ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC 1.81%
BECTON DICKINSON AND CO 1.78%
FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC 1.77%
INTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP 1.70%
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING 1.69%
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO 1.67%
CHEVRON CORP 1.66%
ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY-CL A 1.64%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of National Muni Bond Tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats
Total return, 1 year −0.4% +15.5%
Expense ratio 0.05% 0.35%
Holdings 7873 69
Net assets, MUB as of Oct 27, 2026 and NOBL as of Oct 28, 2026 $54.1bn $11.6bn

MUB and NOBL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

MUB and NOBL flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MUB

MUB tracks an index of National Muni Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year.

NOBL

NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 17.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MUB or NOBL?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned −0.4% and NOBL +15.5%.
Which is cheaper, MUB or NOBL?
MUB is cheaper, by 0.30 percentage points a year. That is about $30 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MUB against NOBL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mub-vs-nobl

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.