Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MTUM vs XLI: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MTUM returned +18.4% to XLI's +10.2%; 10% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MTUM and XLI

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $18.7bn for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF and $30.8bn for State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
+18.4%
MTUM total return, 1 year
+10.2%
XLI total return, 1 year
0.15%
MTUM expense ratio
0.08%
XLI expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLI costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.2 points; XLI is 1.6 times larger.

MTUM vs XLI: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMTUMXLI
Return
Total return, 1 year+18.4%+10.2%
Drawdown
Below its high11.9%, high on Jun 22, 20269.4%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI USA Momentum SR Variant IndexIndustrial Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.08%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$18.7bn$30.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common10%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund35.5%37.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 26, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 704 weekly returns
MTUM XLI
Return
Total return edge MTUM +554.7% +407.9%
Annualized edge MTUM +14.9% +12.8%
Price return edge MTUM +459.1% +299.3%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 19.0% 18.8%
Max drawdown edge MTUM −31.9% −39.3%
Downside capture 101.7% 102.2%
Beta 1.02 1.03
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge MTUM 0.73 0.63
Sortino edge MTUM 1.07 0.92
Treynor 0.135 0.087
Calmar edge MTUM 0.47 0.32
Against the benchmark
Alpha +1.3% a year +0.6% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.53 0.35
Information ratio 0.17 0.10
Tracking error 9.3% 9.4%

Each against its own benchmark: MTUM against MLRG, Apr 26, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; XLI against SPY, Dec 31, 1998 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

MTUM returned more: +554.7% to +407.9%. MTUM and XLI swung about the same: 19.0% and 18.8%. MTUM fell less at its worst: −31.9% to −39.3%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: MTUM vs XLI: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMTUMXLIEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+554.7%+407.9%MTUMPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+14.9%+12.8%MTUMTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+459.1%+299.3%MTUMPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility19.0%18.8%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.0%13.0%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−31.9%−39.3%MTUMDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture106.2%105.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture101.7%102.2%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.021.03Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.760.79Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.730.63MTUMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.070.92MTUMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1350.087Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.470.32MTUMAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkMLRGSPYThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+1.3% a year+0.6% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.530.35Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.7% to +6.3%−2.9% to +4.1%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.170.10Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error9.3%9.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 704 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

10%

By the books each fund has filed, MTUM and XLI hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

10% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MTUM XLI
CATERPILLAR INC 1.92% 6.14%
GE VERNOVA 1.46% 4.47%
UNION PACIFIC 1.03% 3.34%
CSX 0.72% 1.81%
QUANTA SERVICES INC 0.55% 1.63%
JOHNSON CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL PLC 0.47% 1.77%
HOWMET AEROSPACE 0.46% 1.43%
BLOOM ENERGY CLASS A 0.40% 1.21%
WW GRAINGER INC 0.35% 1.09%
CUMMINS INC 0.34% 1.37%
FEDEX CORP 0.32% 1.27%
VERTIV HOLDINGS CLASS A 0.32% 1.50%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MTUM
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 6.06%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 5.00%
INTEL CORPORATION 3.92%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.64%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.45%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.96%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS 2.88%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.62%
Only in XLI
GENERAL ELECTRIC 5.79%
RTX CORP 4.91%
DEERE + CO 3.01%
EATON CORP PLC 2.79%
UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC 2.52%
BOEING CO 2.49%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP 2.37%
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING 2.18%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF XLI State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor Tracks an index of Industrials
Total return, 1 year +18.4% +10.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.6% (MLRG) +13.6% (SPY)
Gap to its benchmark +4.8 pts vs MLRG −3.4 pts vs SPY
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.08%
Already in the S&P 500 93.2% 99.9%
Holdings 126 84
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $18.7bn $30.8bn

MTUM and XLI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-DB523F08A3

MTUM and XLI do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. MTUM follows MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index and XLI follows Industrial Select Sector Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 10% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 MTUM returned +18.4% and XLI +10.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 8.2 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

MTUM and XLI flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MTUM

MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 35.5%. It sat 11.9% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XLI

XLI tracks an index of Industrials. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +10.2% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 84 positions, with the top ten at 37.8%. It sat 9.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MTUM or XLI?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MTUM returned +18.4% and XLI +10.2%.
Which is cheaper, MTUM or XLI?
XLI is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MTUM and XLI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 93% of MTUM and 100% of XLI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MTUM against XLI, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-xli

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.