Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MTUM vs VLUE: how they differ

MTUM and VLUE hold 20% of their weight in the same names, and VLUE returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MTUM and VLUE hold 20% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions MTUM and VLUE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingMTUMVLUE
MICRON TECHNOLOGY5.20%21.65%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC3.48%4.14%
DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC CLASS C1.88%1.71%
CITIGROUP0.95%1.63%
HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE0.81%1.74%
VALERO ENERGY CORP1.10%0.81%
CVS HEALTH0.75%1.35%
CSX0.67%0.72%
EOG RESOURCES0.43%0.77%
TARGET CORP0.41%0.83%
NETAPP INC0.33%0.45%
FEDEX CORP0.32%1.24%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MTUMOnly in VLUE
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 5.39%VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC 3.05%
INTEL CORPORATION 4.14%AT&T 2.69%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.38%BANK OF AMERICA 2.15%
SANDISK 3.10%FORD MOTOR CO 1.94%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 2.87%COMCAST CLASS A 1.79%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.69%PFIZER 1.70%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.69%QUALCOMM 1.64%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS 2.40%WALT DISNEY 1.62%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

MTUM and VLUE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
VLUE
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isMSCI USA Momentum FactorMSCI USA Value Factor
Total return, 1 year+21.8%+69.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.3 pts+51.9 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50098.2%96.9%
Holdings128148

MTUM in plain words

MTUM is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 128 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%. It sat 11.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VLUE in plain words

VLUE is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Value Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +69.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 148 positions, with the top ten at 44.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MTUM or VLUE?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MTUM returned +21.8% and VLUE returned +69.4%, so VLUE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MTUM or VLUE?
MTUM charges 0.15% a year and VLUE charges 0.15%, so MTUM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MTUM and VLUE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 98% of MTUM and 97% of VLUE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 20% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MTUM against VLUE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MTUM against VLUE, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-vlue Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources