Which returned more over the last year, MTUM or SGOV?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MTUM returned +21.8% and SGOV returned +3.8%, so MTUM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, MTUM or SGOV?

MTUM charges 0.15% a year and SGOV charges 0.09%, so SGOV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MTUM vs SGOV: how they differ

MTUM and SGOV hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MTUM returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MTUM and SGOV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MTUM	Only in SGOV
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 5.39%	TREASURY BILL 0.94%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 5.20%	BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.51%
INTEL CORPORATION 4.14%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.48%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.38%
SANDISK 3.10%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 2.87%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.69%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

MTUM and SGOV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF	SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	MSCI USA Momentum Factor	0-3 month T-bills
Total return, 1 year	+21.8%	+3.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+4.3 pts	−13.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.09%
Holdings	128	23

MTUM in plain words

MTUM is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 128 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%. It sat 11.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SGOV in plain words

SGOV is a cash and treasury bills tracking the 0-3 month T-bills. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MTUM or SGOV?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MTUM returned +21.8% and SGOV returned +3.8%, so MTUM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MTUM or SGOV?: MTUM charges 0.15% a year and SGOV charges 0.09%, so SGOV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MTUM against SGOV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MTUM against SGOV, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-sgov Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources