Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
MTUM vs SCHX: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MTUM returned +18.4% to SCHX's +13.1%; 25% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MTUM and SCHX
Net assets: $18.7bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF, and $74.2bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF.
Pair scorecard
SCHX costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.3 points.
| Measure | MTUM | SCHX |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +18.4% | +13.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 11.9%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, MTUM as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHX as of Aug 31, 2026 | $18.7bn | $74.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 25% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 35.5% | 36.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, MTUM and SCHX hold 25% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
25% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
MTUM and SCHX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MTUM and SCHX are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. MTUM follows MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index and SCHX follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index.
- Holdings in common. 25% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 MTUM returned +18.4% and SCHX +13.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 5.3 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
MTUM
MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 35.5%. It sat 11.9% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
SCHX
SCHX tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 747 positions, with the top ten at 36.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MTUM or SCHX?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MTUM returned +18.4% and SCHX +13.1%.
- Which is cheaper, MTUM or SCHX?
- SCHX is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MTUM against SCHX, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-schx
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). MTUM against SCHX. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-schx
[MTUM against SCHX (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-schx)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.