Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MOAT vs SHY: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MOAT returned +10.3% to SHY's +1.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MOAT and SHY

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $11.6bn for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF and $27.4bn for iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF.

At a glance
+10.3%
MOAT total return, 1 year
+1.6%
SHY total return, 1 year
0.46%
MOAT expense ratio
0.15%
SHY expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SHY costs 0.31 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.7 points; SHY is 2.4 times larger.

MOAT vs SHY: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMOATSHY
Return
Total return, 1 year+10.3%+1.6%
Drawdown
Below its high3.7%, high on Aug 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMorningstar Wide Moat Focus IndexICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.46%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$11.6bn$27.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight92%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund26.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MOAT and SHY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MOAT SHY
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MOAT
Danaher Corp 2.85%
Microsoft Corp 2.81%
Estee Lauder Cos Inc 2.78%
Tyler Technologies Inc 2.73%
Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc 2.65%
Brown-Forman Corp 2.57%
Kenvue Inc 2.57%
Ge Healthcare Technologies Inc 2.55%
Only in SHY
TREASURY NOTE 2.11%
TREASURY NOTE 1.99%
TREASURY NOTE 1.83%
TREASURY NOTE 1.73%
TREASURY NOTE 1.62%
TREASURY NOTE 1.54%
TREASURY NOTE 1.51%
TREASURY NOTE 1.49%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF SHY iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat Tracks an index of 1-3 Year Treasury Bond
Total return, 1 year +10.3% +1.6%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +1.7% (BBSB)
Gap to its benchmark −3.4 pts vs VOO −0.1 pts vs BBSB
Expense ratio 0.46% 0.15%
Holdings 54 90
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $11.6bn $27.4bn

MOAT and SHY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

MOAT and SHY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MOAT

MOAT tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +10.3% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 54 positions, with the top ten at 26.5%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SHY

SHY tracks an index of 1-3 Year Treasury Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.6% with distributions reinvested, against +1.7% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MOAT or SHY?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MOAT returned +10.3% and SHY +1.6%.
Which is cheaper, MOAT or SHY?
SHY is cheaper, by 0.31 percentage points a year. That is about $31 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MOAT against SHY, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/moat-vs-shy

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.