Which returned more over the last year, IGSB or MOAT?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGSB returned +1.7% and MOAT returned +11.3%, so MOAT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, IGSB or MOAT?

IGSB charges 0.04% a year and MOAT charges 0.46%, so IGSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IGSB vs MOAT: how they differ

IGSB and MOAT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MOAT returned more over the year.

iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IGSB and MOAT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IGSB	Only in MOAT
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.56%	Veeva Systems Inc 3.41%
EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO S. R.L. 144A 0.29%	Airbnb Inc 2.88%
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES COR 144A 0.15%	Microsoft Corp 2.79%
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM INTERNATIONAL FIN 0.10%	Charles Schwab Corp/The 2.75%
BAYER US FINANCE II LLC 144A 0.09%	Lpl Financial Holdings Inc 2.73%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO MTN 0.09%	Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.58%
GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA (FXD-FRN) 0.08%	Nvidia Corp 2.58%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC/THE MTN 0.08%	Estee Lauder Cos Inc/The 2.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

IGSB and MOAT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IGSB iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	VanEck
What it is	1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond	Morningstar Wide Moat
Total return, 1 year	+1.7%	+11.3%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−15.8 pts	−6.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.04%	0.46%
Holdings	4496	55

IGSB in plain words

IGSB is a bond fund tracking the 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year.

MOAT in plain words

MOAT is an index equity fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 55 positions, with the top ten at 27.1%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IGSB or MOAT?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGSB returned +1.7% and MOAT returned +11.3%, so MOAT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IGSB or MOAT?: IGSB charges 0.04% a year and MOAT charges 0.46%, so IGSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IGSB against MOAT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IGSB against MOAT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/igsb-vs-moat Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources