Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MOAT vs QUAL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MOAT returned +10.3% to QUAL's +13.1%; 14% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MOAT and QUAL

Net assets: $11.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF, and $48.2bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF.

At a glance
+10.3%
MOAT total return, 1 year
+13.1%
QUAL total return, 1 year
0.46%
MOAT expense ratio
0.15%
QUAL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

QUAL costs 0.31 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.8 points; QUAL is 4.1 times larger.

MOAT vs QUAL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMOATQUAL
Return
Total return, 1 year+10.3%+13.1%
Drawdown
Below its high3.7%, high on Aug 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMorningstar Wide Moat Focus IndexMSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.46%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 23, 2026$11.8bn$48.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common14%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund26.5%44.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jul 26, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 691 weekly returns
MOAT QUAL
Return
Total return edge QUAL (slight) +408.4% +444.7%
Annualized edge QUAL (slight) +13.0% +13.6%
Price return edge QUAL (slight) +329.1% +346.8%
Risk
Volatility edge QUAL (slight) 17.4% 16.2%
Max drawdown edge Tie −30.8% −31.4%
Downside capture 100.0% 98.8%
Beta 0.98 0.97
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge QUAL (slight) 0.68 0.75
Sortino edge QUAL (slight) 1.00 1.09
Treynor 0.130 0.126
Calmar edge QUAL (slight) 0.42 0.43
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.1% a year +0.6% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.06 0.59
Information ratio −0.05 0.06
Tracking error 7.6% 3.7%

Each against its own benchmark: MOAT against VOO, May 4, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026; QUAL against MLRG, Jul 26, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

QUAL returned slightly more: +444.7% to +408.4%. QUAL swung slightly less: 16.2% to 17.4%. MOAT and QUAL fell about the same at their worst: −30.8% and −31.4%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: MOAT vs QUAL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMOATQUALEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+408.4%+444.7%QUAL (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+13.0%+13.6%QUAL (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+329.1%+346.8%QUAL (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility17.4%16.2%QUAL (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.8%11.2%QUAL (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−30.8%−31.4%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture98.2%98.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.0%98.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.980.97Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.810.95Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.680.75QUAL (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.001.09QUAL (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1300.126Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.420.43QUAL (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOMLRGThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.1% a year+0.6% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.060.59Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−4.0% to +3.8%−1.4% to +2.6%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.050.06Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error7.6%3.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 691 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

14%

By the books each fund has filed, MOAT and QUAL hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

14% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MOAT QUAL
Microsoft Corp 2.81% 8.09%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.48% 4.06%
Nvidia Corp 2.38% 6.28%
Alphabet Inc 1.18% 1.82%
Applied Materials Inc 1.08% 2.39%
Lockheed Martin Corp 1.47% 1.01%
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc 1.11% 0.73%
Motorola Solutions Inc 1.38% 0.45%
Charles Schwab Corp 2.19% 0.41%
Autodesk Inc 1.38% 0.36%
Pepsico Inc 1.10% 0.34%
Zoetis Inc 2.44% 0.15%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MOAT
Danaher Corp 2.85%
Estee Lauder Cos Inc 2.78%
Tyler Technologies Inc 2.73%
Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc 2.65%
Brown-Forman Corp 2.57%
Kenvue Inc 2.57%
Ge Healthcare Technologies Inc 2.55%
Otis Worldwide Corp 2.53%
Only in QUAL
APPLE 7.38%
ELI LILLY 4.04%
TJX 3.50%
VISA CLASS A 3.44%
LAM RESEARCH 2.84%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.50%
MASTERCARD CLASS A 2.40%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.14%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat Tracks the MSCI USA Quality Factor
Total return, 1 year +10.3% +13.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +13.6% (MLRG)
Gap to its benchmark −3.4 pts vs VOO −0.5 pts vs MLRG
Expense ratio 0.46% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 91.6% 97.2%
Holdings 54 119
Net assets, MOAT as of Oct 27, 2026 and QUAL as of Oct 28, 2026 $11.6bn $48.2bn

MOAT and QUAL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-214B409E60

MOAT and QUAL do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. MOAT follows Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index and QUAL follows MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 14% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 MOAT returned +10.3% and QUAL +13.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.8 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

MOAT and QUAL flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MOAT

MOAT tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +10.3% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 54 positions, with the top ten at 26.5%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

QUAL

QUAL tracks the MSCI USA Quality Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 119 positions, with the top ten at 44.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MOAT or QUAL?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MOAT returned +10.3% and QUAL +13.1%.
Which is cheaper, MOAT or QUAL?
QUAL is cheaper, by 0.31 percentage points a year. That is about $31 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MOAT and QUAL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of MOAT and 97% of QUAL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MOAT against QUAL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/moat-vs-qual

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.