Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MOAT vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MOAT returned +10.3% to QQQM's +15.2%; 18% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MOAT and QQQM

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $11.6bn for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF and $110.4bn for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF.

At a glance
+10.3%
MOAT total return, 1 year
+15.2%
QQQM total return, 1 year
0.46%
MOAT expense ratio
0.15%
QQQM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

QQQM costs 0.31 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.9 points; QQQM is 9.5 times larger.

MOAT vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMOATQQQM
Return
Total return, 1 year+10.3%+15.2%
Drawdown
Below its high3.7%, high on Aug 27, 20264.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMorningstar Wide Moat Focus IndexNasdaq-100 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.46%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$11.6bn$110.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common18%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund26.5%46.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 313 weekly returns
MOAT QQQM
Return
Total return edge QQQM +113.7% +157.2%
Annualized edge QQQM +13.5% +17.0%
Price return edge QQQM +98.6% +147.9%
Risk
Volatility edge MOAT 18.0% 21.0%
Max drawdown edge MOAT −23.9% −35.0%
Downside capture 100.0% 99.8%
Beta 0.98 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge QQQM 0.61 0.70
Sortino edge QQQM 0.92 1.07
Treynor 0.130 0.147
Calmar edge MOAT 0.56 0.49
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.1% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.06 0.62
Information ratio −0.05 0.10
Tracking error 7.6% 0.4%

Each against its own benchmark: MOAT against VOO, May 4, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026; QQQM against QQQ, Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

QQQM returned more: +157.2% to +113.7%. MOAT swung less: 18.0% to 21.0%. MOAT fell less at its worst: −23.9% to −35.0%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: MOAT vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMOATQQQMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+113.7%+157.2%QQQMPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+13.5%+17.0%QQQMTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+98.6%+147.9%QQQMPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility18.0%21.0%MOATSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.9%13.6%MOATLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−23.9%−35.0%MOATDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture98.2%99.6%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.0%99.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.981.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.811.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.610.70QQQMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.921.07QQQMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1300.147Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.560.49MOATAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOQQQThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.1% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.060.62Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−4.0% to +3.8%−0.2% to +0.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.050.10Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error7.6%0.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 313 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

18%

By the books each fund has filed, MOAT and QQQM hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

18% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MOAT QQQM
Microsoft Corp 2.81% 6.14%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.48% 2.87%
Nvidia Corp 2.38% 8.17%
Broadcom Inc 2.19% 2.53%
Texas Instruments Inc 1.48% 1.21%
Amazon.Com Inc 1.21% 4.25%
Alphabet Inc 1.18% 2.93%
Applied Materials Inc 1.08% 1.35%
Pepsico Inc 1.10% 0.78%
Synopsys Inc 1.50% 0.39%
Mercadolibre Inc 1.21% 0.36%
Mondelez International Inc 2.43% 0.34%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MOAT
Danaher Corp 2.85%
Estee Lauder Cos Inc 2.78%
Tyler Technologies Inc 2.73%
Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc 2.65%
Brown-Forman Corp 2.57%
Kenvue Inc 2.57%
Otis Worldwide Corp 2.53%
Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc 2.49%
Only in QQQM
Apple Inc 7.88%
Micron Technology Inc 4.50%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.93%
Tesla Inc 3.33%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 2.74%
Alphabet Inc 2.72%
Walmart Inc 2.49%
Intel Corp 2.12%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat Tracks the Nasdaq-100
Total return, 1 year +10.3% +15.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +15.2% (QQQ)
Gap to its benchmark −3.4 pts vs VOO 0.0 pts vs QQQ
Expense ratio 0.46% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 91.6% 95.7%
Holdings 54 105
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $11.6bn $110.4bn

MOAT and QQQM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-C934A6150B

MOAT and QQQM do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. MOAT follows Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index and QQQM follows Nasdaq-100 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 18% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 MOAT returned +10.3% and QQQM +15.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.9 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

MOAT and QQQM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MOAT

MOAT tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +10.3% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 54 positions, with the top ten at 26.5%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

QQQM

QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.2% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 46.7%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MOAT or QQQM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MOAT returned +10.3% and QQQM +15.2%.
Which is cheaper, MOAT or QQQM?
QQQM is cheaper, by 0.31 percentage points a year. That is about $31 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MOAT and QQQM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of MOAT and 96% of QQQM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MOAT against QQQM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/moat-vs-qqqm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.