Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MINT vs VT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MINT returned +4.2% to VT's +13.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MINT and VT

Net assets: $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund, and $81.8bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total World Stock Index ETF.

At a glance
+4.2%
MINT total return, 1 year
+13.5%
VT total return, 1 year
0.36%
MINT expense ratio
0.06%
VT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VT costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.3 points.

MINT vs VT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMINTVT
Return
Total return, 1 year+4.2%+13.5%
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedFTSE Global All Cap Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.36%0.06%
Net assets, MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and VT as of Sep 30, 2026$16.4bn$81.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight55%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund22.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MINT and VT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MINT VT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MINT
United States Treasury 6.21%
Fannie Mae 1.12%
Freddie Mac 0.99%
SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.87%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.77%
AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.77%
Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.71%
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.70%
Only in VT
NVIDIA Corp 4.54%
Apple Inc 4.11%
Microsoft Corp 3.25%
Amazon.com Inc 2.06%
Alphabet Inc 1.73%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 1.62%
Broadcom Inc 1.39%
Meta Platforms Inc 1.36%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund VT Vanguard Total World Stock Index ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Total World Stock
Total return, 1 year +4.2% +13.5%
Expense ratio 0.36% 0.06%
Holdings 977 10194
Net assets, MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and VT as of Sep 30, 2026 $16.4bn $81.8bn

MINT and VT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MINT

MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.

VT

VT tracks an index of Total World Stock. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10,194 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MINT or VT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.2% and VT +13.5%.
Which is cheaper, MINT or VT?
VT is cheaper, by 0.30 percentage points a year. That is about $30 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MINT against VT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-vt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.