Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
MINT vs VRIG: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MINT returned +4.2% to VRIG's +4.3%, and VRIG charges 0.30% to MINT's 0.36%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MINT and VRIG
Net assets: $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund, and $2.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF.
Pair scorecard
VRIG costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points.
| Measure | MINT | VRIG |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +4.2% | +4.3% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.36% | 0.30% |
| Net assets, MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and VRIG as of Oct 27, 2026 | $16.4bn | $2.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | report dates differ | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Sep 30, 2016 to Oct 23, 2026 · 525 weekly returnsVRIG returned more: +40.8% to +31.7%. MINT swung less: 1.4% to 3.4%. MINT fell less at its worst: −4.6% to −12.1%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | MINT | VRIG | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +31.7% | +40.8% | VRIG | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +2.8% | +3.5% | VRIG | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −0.8% | −0.2% | VRIG | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 1.4% | 3.4% | MINT | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 1.2% | 2.8% | MINT | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −4.6% | −12.1% | MINT | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.17 | 0.28 | VRIG | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.19 | 0.34 | VRIG | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.60 | 0.29 | MINT | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 525 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Side by side
MINT and VRIG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MINT and VRIG are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows (similar). Both follow No index, actively managed.
- One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 MINT returned +4.2% and VRIG +4.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.1 points.
- Number of holdings (similar). MINT holds 977 positions and VRIG holds 361.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
MINT
MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.
VRIG
VRIG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MINT or VRIG?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.2% and VRIG +4.3%.
- Which is cheaper, MINT or VRIG?
- VRIG is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MINT against VRIG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-vrig
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). MINT against VRIG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-vrig
[MINT against VRIG (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-vrig)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.