Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MINT vs VOO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MINT returned +4.2% to VOO's +13.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MINT and VOO

Net assets: $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund, and $1.0tn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF.

At a glance
+4.2%
MINT total return, 1 year
+13.7%
VOO total return, 1 year
0.36%
MINT expense ratio
0.03%
VOO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VOO costs 0.33 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.5 points.

MINT vs VOO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMINTVOO
Return
Total return, 1 year+4.2%+13.7%
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedS&P 500 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.36%0.03%
Net assets, MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and VOO as of Sep 30, 2026$16.4bn$1.0tn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight100%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund39.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MINT and VOO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MINT VOO
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MINT
United States Treasury 6.21%
Fannie Mae 1.12%
Freddie Mac 0.99%
SUMISHO AIR LEASE CORP 0.87%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.77%
AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.77%
Trillium Credit Card Trust II 0.71%
INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 0.70%
Only in VOO
NVIDIA Corp 8.40%
Apple Inc 7.39%
Microsoft Corp 5.79%
Amazon.com Inc 3.72%
Alphabet Inc 3.07%
Broadcom Inc 2.54%
Alphabet Inc 2.46%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.43%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the S&P 500
Total return, 1 year +4.2% +13.7%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark not measured 0.0 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.36% 0.03%
Holdings 977 507
Net assets, MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and VOO as of Sep 30, 2026 $16.4bn $1.0tn

MINT and VOO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MINT

MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.

VOO

VOO tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.7% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 507 positions, with the top ten at 39.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MINT or VOO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.2% and VOO +13.7%.
Which is cheaper, MINT or VOO?
VOO is cheaper, by 0.33 percentage points a year. That is about $33 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MINT against VOO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-voo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.