Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
MINT vs VEA: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MINT returned +4.2% to VEA's +17.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MINT and VEA
Net assets: $16.4bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund, and $231.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF.
Pair scorecard
VEA costs 0.33 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.9 points.
| Measure | MINT | VEA |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +4.2% | +17.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.4%, high on Aug 25, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.36% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, MINT as of Jun 30, 2026 and VEA as of Sep 30, 2026 | $16.4bn | $231.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 13.6% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, MINT and VEA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
MINT and VEA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MINT
MINT is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year.
VEA
VEA tracks an index of Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3,906 positions, with the top ten at 13.6%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MINT or VEA?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MINT returned +4.2% and VEA +17.1%.
- Which is cheaper, MINT or VEA?
- VEA is cheaper, by 0.33 percentage points a year. That is about $33 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MINT against VEA, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-vea
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). MINT against VEA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-vea
[MINT against VEA (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mint-vs-vea)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.