Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MGK vs NOBL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MGK returned +7.8% to NOBL's +15.5%; 1% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MGK and NOBL

Net assets: $34.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Growth ETF, and $11.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.

At a glance
+7.8%
MGK total return, 1 year
+15.5%
NOBL total return, 1 year
0.05%
MGK expense ratio
0.35%
NOBL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MGK costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.7 points; MGK is 3.2 times larger.

MGK vs NOBL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMGKNOBL
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.8%+15.5%
Drawdown
Below its high4.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMorningstar US Mega Cap Growth IndexS&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.05%0.35%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$34.9bn$10.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common1%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund64.5%17.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

1%

By the books each fund has filed, MGK and NOBL hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

1% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MGK NOBL
Ecolab Inc 0.43% 1.53%
Cintas Corp 0.32% 1.49%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MGK
NVIDIA Corp 13.69%
Apple Inc 12.53%
Microsoft Corp 9.46%
Alphabet Inc 4.98%
Meta Platforms Inc 4.96%
Broadcom Inc 4.30%
Amazon.com Inc 4.22%
Alphabet Inc 3.95%
Only in NOBL
ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC 1.81%
BECTON DICKINSON AND CO 1.78%
FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC 1.77%
INTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP 1.70%
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING 1.69%
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO 1.67%
CHEVRON CORP 1.66%
ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY-CL A 1.64%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MGK Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Growth ETF NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Mega Cap Growth Tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats
Total return, 1 year +7.8% +15.5%
Expense ratio 0.05% 0.35%
Already in the S&P 500 99.0% 98.3%
Holdings 54 69
Net assets, MGK as of Sep 30, 2026 and NOBL as of Oct 28, 2026 $34.9bn $11.6bn

MGK and NOBL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

NOBL flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MGK

MGK tracks an index of Mega Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 54 positions, with the top ten at 64.5%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

NOBL

NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 17.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MGK or NOBL?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MGK returned +7.8% and NOBL +15.5%.
Which is cheaper, MGK or NOBL?
MGK is cheaper, by 0.30 percentage points a year. That is about $30 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MGK and NOBL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of MGK and 98% of NOBL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MGK against NOBL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mgk-vs-nobl

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.