Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

COWZ vs MGK: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, COWZ returned +24.4% to MGK's +7.8%; 1% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about COWZ and MGK

Net assets: $19.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF, and $34.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Growth ETF.

At a glance
+24.4%
COWZ total return, 1 year
+7.8%
MGK total return, 1 year
0.49%
COWZ expense ratio
0.05%
MGK expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MGK costs 0.44 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 16.6 points.

COWZ vs MGK: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCOWZMGK
Return
Total return, 1 year+24.4%+7.8%
Drawdown
Below its high4.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksPacer US Cash Cows 100 IndexMorningstar US Mega Cap Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.49%0.05%
Net assets, COWZ as of Oct 27, 2026 and MGK as of Sep 30, 2026$19.5bn$34.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common1%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund20.4%64.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

1%

By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and MGK hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

1% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first COWZ MGK
Booking Holdings Inc 2.23% 0.55%
Airbnb Inc 1.54% 0.40%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in COWZ
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.18%
HCA Healthcare Inc 2.07%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 2.06%
General Dynamics Corp 2.05%
Intuit Inc 2.04%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.97%
AT&T Inc 1.95%
Gilead Sciences Inc 1.93%
Only in MGK
NVIDIA Corp 13.69%
Apple Inc 12.53%
Microsoft Corp 9.46%
Alphabet Inc 4.98%
Meta Platforms Inc 4.96%
Broadcom Inc 4.30%
Amazon.com Inc 4.22%
Alphabet Inc 3.95%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF MGK Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100 Tracks an index of Mega Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year +24.4% +7.8%
Expense ratio 0.49% 0.05%
Already in the S&P 500 94.7% 99.0%
Holdings 100 54
Net assets, COWZ as of Oct 27, 2026 and MGK as of Sep 30, 2026 $19.5bn $34.9bn

COWZ and MGK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

COWZ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
COWZ

COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.

MGK

MGK tracks an index of Mega Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 54 positions, with the top ten at 64.5%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or MGK?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +24.4% and MGK +7.8%.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or MGK?
MGK is cheaper, by 0.44 percentage points a year. That is about $44 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do COWZ and MGK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of COWZ and 99% of MGK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, COWZ against MGK, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-mgk

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.