Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MBB vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MBB returned −0.8% to VTWO's +14.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MBB and VTWO

Net assets: $35.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MBS ETF, and $16.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF.

At a glance
−0.8%
MBB total return, 1 year
+14.3%
VTWO total return, 1 year
0.04%
MBB expense ratio
0.06%
VTWO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MBB costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 15.1 points; MBB is 2.2 times larger.

MBB vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMBBVTWO
Return
Total return, 1 year−0.8%+14.3%
Drawdown
Below its high7.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. MBS IndexRussell 2000 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.04%0.06%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$36.2bn$16.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund5.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MBB and VTWO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MBB VTWO
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MBB
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 5.45%
FHLMC 30YR UMBS SUPER 1.05%
UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A) 0.60%
GNMA2 30YR 0.59%
GNMA2 30YR 0.54%
FNMA 30YR UMBS 0.53%
GNMA2 30YR 0.53%
GNMA2 30YR 0.52%
Only in VTWO
SLBBH1142 2.36%
Twist Bioscience Corp 0.42%
Moog Inc 0.36%
10X Genomics Inc 0.35%
JFrog Ltd 0.35%
UMB Financial Corp 0.32%
BrightSpring Health Services Inc 0.31%
Glaukos Corp 0.31%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MBB iShares MBS ETF VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of mortgage-backed securities Tracks the Russell 2000
Total return, 1 year −0.8% +14.3%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.1% (SPMB) +14.1% (IWM)
Gap to its benchmark +0.3 pts vs SPMB +0.2 pts vs IWM
Expense ratio 0.04% 0.06%
Holdings 10813 2002
Net assets, MBB as of Oct 28, 2026 and VTWO as of Sep 30, 2026 $35.5bn $16.6bn

MBB and VTWO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

MBB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MBB

MBB tracks an index of mortgage-backed securities. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.1% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. MBS Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year.

VTWO

VTWO tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,002 positions, with the top ten at 5.4%. It sat 7.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MBB or VTWO?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MBB returned −0.8% and VTWO +14.3%.
Which is cheaper, MBB or VTWO?
MBB is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MBB against VTWO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mbb-vs-vtwo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.