Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MBB vs VHT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MBB returned −0.8% to VHT's +25.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MBB and VHT

Net assets: $35.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MBS ETF, and $19.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Health Care ETF.

At a glance
−0.8%
MBB total return, 1 year
+25.0%
VHT total return, 1 year
0.04%
MBB expense ratio
0.09%
VHT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MBB costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 25.8 points; MBB is 1.9 times larger.

MBB vs VHT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMBBVHT
Return
Total return, 1 year−0.8%+25.0%
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. MBS IndexMSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Health Care 25/50
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.04%0.09%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$36.2bn$19.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight86%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund51.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MBB and VHT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MBB VHT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MBB
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 5.45%
FHLMC 30YR UMBS SUPER 1.05%
UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A) 0.60%
GNMA2 30YR 0.59%
GNMA2 30YR 0.54%
FNMA 30YR UMBS 0.53%
GNMA2 30YR 0.53%
GNMA2 30YR 0.52%
Only in VHT
Eli Lilly & Co 12.95%
Johnson & Johnson 8.79%
AbbVie Inc 6.46%
Merck & Co Inc 5.02%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 4.66%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 3.51%
Amgen Inc 3.18%
Gilead Sciences Inc 2.59%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MBB iShares MBS ETF VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of mortgage-backed securities Tracks an index of Health Care
Total return, 1 year −0.8% +25.0%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.1% (SPMB) +25.4% (FHLC)
Gap to its benchmark +0.3 pts vs SPMB −0.4 pts vs FHLC
Expense ratio 0.04% 0.09%
Holdings 10813 414
Net assets, MBB as of Oct 28, 2026 and VHT as of Sep 30, 2026 $35.5bn $19.1bn

MBB and VHT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

MBB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MBB

MBB tracks an index of mortgage-backed securities. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.1% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. MBS Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year.

VHT

VHT tracks an index of Health Care. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.0% with distributions reinvested, against +25.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Health Care 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 414 positions, with the top ten at 51.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MBB or VHT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MBB returned −0.8% and VHT +25.0%.
Which is cheaper, MBB or VHT?
MBB is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MBB against VHT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mbb-vs-vht

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.