Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MAGS vs VGLT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MAGS returned +5.8% to VGLT's −6.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MAGS and VGLT

Net assets: $5.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF, and $10.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF.

At a glance
+5.8%
MAGS total return, 1 year
−6.7%
VGLT total return, 1 year
0.30%
MAGS expense ratio
0.03%
VGLT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VGLT costs 0.27 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.5 points.

MAGS vs VGLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMAGSVGLT
Return
Total return, 1 year+5.8%−6.7%
Drawdown
Below its high4.1%, high on Oct 13, 202638.8%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedBloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.30%0.03%
Net assets, MAGS as of Oct 28, 2026 and VGLT as of Sep 30, 2026$5.5bn$10.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight22%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund29.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and VGLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MAGS VGLT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MAGS
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 6.83%
NVIDIA Corp 3.52%
Apple Inc 3.49%
Amazon.com Inc 3.48%
Tesla Inc 3.45%
Microsoft Corp 3.07%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.04%
Alphabet Inc 2.45%
Only in VGLT
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.19%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.13%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.13%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.10%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.08%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.08%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.07%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.05%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF VGLT Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Long-term Treasury
Total return, 1 year +5.8% −6.7%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured −6.7% (SCHQ)
Gap to its benchmark not measured 0.0 pts vs SCHQ
Expense ratio 0.30% 0.03%
Holdings 8 102
Net assets, MAGS as of Oct 28, 2026 and VGLT as of Sep 30, 2026 $5.5bn $10.4bn

MAGS and VGLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

MAGS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MAGS

MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VGLT

VGLT tracks an index of Long-term Treasury. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −6.7% with distributions reinvested, against −6.7% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 38.8% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or VGLT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +5.8% and VGLT −6.7%.
Which is cheaper, MAGS or VGLT?
VGLT is cheaper, by 0.27 percentage points a year. That is about $27 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MAGS against VGLT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-vglt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.