Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

MAGS vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MAGS returned +5.8% to TLT's −7.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MAGS and TLT

Net assets: $5.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF, and $47.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.

At a glance
+5.8%
MAGS total return, 1 year
−7.9%
TLT total return, 1 year
0.30%
MAGS expense ratio
0.15%
TLT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

TLT costs 0.15 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 13.7 points; TLT is 8.6 times larger.

MAGS vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMAGSTLT
Return
Total return, 1 year+5.8%−7.9%
Drawdown
Below its high4.1%, high on Oct 13, 202642.6%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.30%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$5.5bn$47.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight22%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund29.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 21, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026 · 183 weekly returns
MAGS TLT
Return
Total return edge MAGS +189.1% −10.0%
Annualized edge MAGS +35.2% −2.9%
Price return edge MAGS +181.4% −22.1%
Risk
Volatility edge TLT 24.0% 13.3%
Max drawdown edge TLT −26.6% −20.5%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge MAGS 1.19 −0.51
Sortino edge MAGS 1.97 −0.68
Calmar edge MAGS 1.33 −0.14
Reading

MAGS returned more: +189.1% to −10.0%. TLT swung less: 13.3% to 24.0%. TLT fell less at its worst: −20.5% to −26.6%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: MAGS vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureMAGSTLTEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+189.1%−10.0%MAGSPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+35.2%−2.9%MAGSTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+181.4%−22.1%MAGSPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility24.0%13.3%TLTSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.5%9.8%TLTLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−26.6%−20.5%TLTDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe1.19−0.51MAGSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.97−0.68MAGSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar1.33−0.14MAGSAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 183 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and TLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MAGS TLT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MAGS
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 6.83%
NVIDIA Corp 3.52%
Apple Inc 3.49%
Amazon.com Inc 3.48%
Tesla Inc 3.45%
Microsoft Corp 3.07%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.04%
Alphabet Inc 2.45%
Only in TLT
TREASURY BOND 4.32%
TREASURY BOND 4.12%
TREASURY BOND (OLD) 4.07%
TREASURY BOND 4.02%
TREASURY BOND 3.93%
TREASURY BOND 3.92%
TREASURY BOND 3.89%
TREASURY BOND 3.88%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries
Total return, 1 year +5.8% −7.9%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured −7.8% (BBLB)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −0.1 pts vs BBLB
Expense ratio 0.30% 0.15%
Holdings 8 47
Net assets, MAGS as of Oct 28, 2026 and TLT as of Oct 27, 2026 $5.5bn $47.4bn

MAGS and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief

No client brief for this pair: the two funds' holdings are dated 119 days apart.

Alert

MAGS and TLT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MAGS

MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

TLT

TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −7.9% with distributions reinvested, against −7.8% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.6% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or TLT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +5.8% and TLT −7.9%.
Which is cheaper, MAGS or TLT?
TLT is cheaper, by 0.15 percentage points a year. That is about $15 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MAGS against TLT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-tlt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.