Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
MAGS vs ONEQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MAGS returned +5.8% to ONEQ's +12.7%; 22% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MAGS and ONEQ
Net assets: $5.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF, and $10.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.
Pair scorecard
ONEQ costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.9 points.
| Measure | MAGS | ONEQ |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +5.8% | +12.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.1%, high on Oct 13, 2026 | 3.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Nasdaq Composite Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.21% |
| Net assets, MAGS as of Oct 28, 2026 and ONEQ as of Sep 30, 2026 | $5.5bn | $10.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 22% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 29.3% | 56.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Apr 21, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026 · 183 weekly returnsMAGS returned more: +189.1% to +121.7%. ONEQ swung less: 18.9% to 24.0%. ONEQ fell less at its worst: −22.0% to −26.6%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | MAGS | ONEQ | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +189.1% | +121.7% | MAGS | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +35.2% | +25.4% | MAGS | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +181.4% | +116.0% | MAGS | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 24.0% | 18.9% | ONEQ | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 14.5% | 12.0% | ONEQ | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −26.6% | −22.0% | ONEQ | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 1.19 | 1.05 | MAGS | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.97 | 1.65 | MAGS | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 1.33 | 1.15 | MAGS | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 183 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and ONEQ hold 22% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
22% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
MAGS and ONEQ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MAGS and ONEQ are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. MAGS follows No index, actively managed and ONEQ follows Nasdaq Composite Index.
- Holdings in common. 22% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 MAGS returned +5.8% and ONEQ +12.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 6.9 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
MAGS
MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
ONEQ
ONEQ tracks the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,026 positions, with the top ten at 56.0%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or ONEQ?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +5.8% and ONEQ +12.7%.
- Which is cheaper, MAGS or ONEQ?
- ONEQ is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MAGS against ONEQ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-oneq
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). MAGS against ONEQ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-oneq
[MAGS against ONEQ (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-oneq)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.