Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
MAGS vs NOBL: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MAGS returned +5.8% to NOBL's +15.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MAGS and NOBL
Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $5.5bn for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF and $11.6bn for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.
Pair scorecard
MAGS costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.7 points; NOBL is 2.1 times larger.
| Measure | MAGS | NOBL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +5.8% | +15.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.1%, high on Oct 13, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.35% |
| Net assets | $5.5bn | $11.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 29.3% | 17.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and NOBL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
MAGS and NOBL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MAGS
MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
NOBL
NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 17.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or NOBL?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +5.8% and NOBL +15.5%.
- Which is cheaper, MAGS or NOBL?
- MAGS is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MAGS against NOBL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-nobl
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). MAGS against NOBL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-nobl
[MAGS against NOBL (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-nobl)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.