Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

LQD vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, LQD returned −3.4% to VGT's +24.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about LQD and VGT

Net assets: $30.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF, and $154.5bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Information Tech ETF.

At a glance
−3.4%
LQD total return, 1 year
+24.7%
VGT total return, 1 year
0.14%
LQD expense ratio
0.09%
VGT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VGT costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 28.1 points; VGT is 5.5 times larger.

LQD vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureLQDVGT
Return
Total return, 1 year−3.4%+24.7%
Drawdown
Below its high6.3%, high on Sep 22, 20214.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMarkit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade IndexMSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.14%0.09%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$28.3bn$154.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight87%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund63.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Feb 6, 2004 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,185 weekly returns
LQD VGT
Return
Total return edge VGT +134.6% +2,280.1%
Annualized edge VGT +3.8% +14.9%
Price return edge VGT −7.1% +1,863.7%
Risk
Volatility edge LQD 8.5% 21.2%
Max drawdown edge LQD −24.7% −52.4%
Downside capture 143.3% 99.9%
Beta 1.70 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VGT 0.27 0.68
Sortino edge VGT 0.38 0.99
Treynor 0.005 0.201
Calmar edge VGT 0.15 0.28
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.7% a year +0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.64 0.80
Information ratio 0.14 0.19
Tracking error 5.2% 0.7%

Each against its own benchmark: LQD against IUSB, Jun 20, 2014 to Oct 23, 2026; VGT against FTEC, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

VGT returned more: +2,280.1% to +134.6%. LQD swung less: 8.5% to 21.2%. LQD fell less at its worst: −24.7% to −52.4%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: LQD vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureLQDVGTEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+134.6%+2,280.1%VGTPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+3.8%+14.9%VGTTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−7.1%+1,863.7%VGTPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility8.5%21.2%LQDSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation6.1%14.4%LQDLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−24.7%−52.4%LQDDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture157.4%100.0%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture143.3%99.9%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.701.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.841.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.270.68VGTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.380.99VGTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0050.201Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.150.28VGTAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIUSBFTECThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.7% a year+0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.640.80Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−1.4% to +2.8%−0.2% to +0.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.140.19Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error5.2%0.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,185 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, LQD and VGT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first LQD VGT
Only in one fund ↓
Only in LQD
ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES LLC 0.20%
CVS HEALTH CORP 0.17%
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES COR 144A 0.16%
T-MOBILE USA INC 0.16%
AMAZON.COM INC 0.14%
BOEING CO 0.14%
CITIGROUP INC 0.14%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 0.14%
Only in VGT
NVIDIA Corp 17.58%
Apple Inc 15.91%
Microsoft Corp 11.16%
Micron Technology Inc 4.45%
Broadcom Inc 4.11%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.67%
Intel Corp 1.98%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.60%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF VGT Vanguard Information Tech ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US investment grade bonds Tracks an index of Information technology
Total return, 1 year −3.4% +24.7%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.2% (IUSB) +25.0% (FTEC)
Gap to its benchmark −2.2 pts vs IUSB −0.3 pts vs FTEC
Expense ratio 0.14% 0.09%
Holdings 3191 320
Net assets, LQD as of Oct 27, 2026 and VGT as of Sep 30, 2026 $30.6bn $154.5bn

LQD and VGT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-716EF5FEE2

LQD and VGT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. LQD follows Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Index and VGT follows MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 LQD returned −3.4% and VGT +24.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 28.1 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

LQD flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
LQD

LQD tracks an index of US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.3% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.

VGT

VGT tracks an index of Information technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.7% with distributions reinvested, against +25.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 320 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, LQD or VGT?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LQD returned −3.4% and VGT +24.7%.
Which is cheaper, LQD or VGT?
VGT is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, LQD against VGT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lqd-vs-vgt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.