Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FTEC vs LQD: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FTEC returned +25.0% to LQD's −3.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FTEC and LQDNet assets: $22.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF, and $30.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
FTEC costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 28.4 points; LQD is 1.3 times larger.
| Measure | FTEC | LQD |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +25.0% | −3.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.9%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 6.3%, high on Sep 22, 2021 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index | Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.14% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $22.1bn | $28.3bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 88% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 62.2% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FTEC and LQD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FTEC and LQD on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FTEC
FTEC tracks the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.0% with distributions reinvested, against +24.7% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 281 positions, with the top ten at 62.2%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
LQD
LQD tracks an index of US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.3% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FTEC or LQD?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTEC returned +25.0% and LQD −3.4%.
- Which is cheaper, FTEC or LQD?
- FTEC is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FTEC against LQD, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftec-vs-lqd
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FTEC against LQD. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftec-vs-lqd
[FTEC against LQD (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftec-vs-lqd)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.