A
vs
B
Share
Compare their flowsAsk IQ about these two funds

LCTU vs OEF: Differences, Returns & Fees

LCTU and OEF hold 63% of their weight in the same names, and OEF returned +16.8% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $1.2bn for iShares U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness Aware Active ETF and $20.8bn for iShares S&P 100 ETF.

LCTU costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.5 points; OEF is 17.4 times larger.

LCTU vs OEF: Differences, Returns & Fees
LCTUOEF
Expense ratio0.15%0.20%
Net assets$1.2bn$20.8bn
Total return, 1 year+15.3%+16.8%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedS&P 100
Holdings in common63%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund35.2%52.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

+15.3%
LCTU total return, 1 year
+16.8%
OEF total return, 1 year
0.15%
LCTU expense ratio
0.20%
OEF expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, LCTU and OEF hold 63% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

half

63% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding LCTU OEF
NVIDIA 7.91% 11.11%
APPLE 7.14% 9.84%
MICROSOFT 5.12% 7.96%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.18% 5.16%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.48% 4.13%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.30% 3.17%
BROADCOM INC 2.05% 3.45%
ALPHABET CLASS C 1.90% 3.31%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.60% 2.33%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.55% 1.99%
TESLA INC 1.49% 2.16%
ELI LILLY 1.33% 1.89%
Only in LCTU
PROLOGIS REIT 1.05%
ECOLAB 0.88%
PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP 0.59%
REPUBLIC SERVICES INC 0.55%
ONEOK 0.53%
ASSURANT INC 0.50%
KLA 0.49%
ANALOG DEVICES 0.48%
Only in OEF
PROCTER & GAMBLE 0.70%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL 0.63%
TEXAS INSTRUMENT INC 0.52%
LINDE PLC 0.45%
MCDONALDS CORP 0.33%
UNION PACIFIC 0.33%
BLACKROCK 0.31%
CHARLES SCHWAB 0.31%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

LCTU
iShares U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness Aware Active ETF
OEF
iShares S&P 100 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
Issuer iShares iShares
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +15.3% +16.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.6% (IWB) not published
Gap to its benchmark −1.4 pts vs IWB not available
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.20%
Already in the S&P 500 93.4% 99.9%
Holdings 322 102
Net assets $1.2bn $20.8bn

LCTU and OEF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About LCTU

LCTU is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 322 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.3% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.

About OEF

OEF tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 102 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, LCTU or OEF?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LCTU returned +15.3% and OEF +16.8%.
Which is cheaper, LCTU or OEF?
LCTU is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do LCTU and OEF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 93% of LCTU and 100% of OEF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
CGDV vs LCTULCTU vs SCHBLCTU vs QUALLCTU vs VVOEF vs SUSLAVLC vs OEFOEF vs STXFOEF vs TDVG
LCTU on its own →OEF on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
LCTU filings on SEC EDGAR ↗LCTU prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for LCTU ↗OEF filings on SEC EDGAR ↗OEF prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for OEF ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, LCTU against OEF, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lctu-vs-oef

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.