Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

KRE vs XOVR: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, KRE returned +21.2% to XOVR's −3.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about KRE and XOVR

Net assets: $4.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF, and $2.2bn on Jun 30, 2026 for ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF.

At a glance
+21.2%
KRE total return, 1 year
−3.0%
XOVR total return, 1 year
0.35%
KRE expense ratio
1.81%
XOVR expense ratio

Pair scorecard

KRE costs 1.46 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 24.2 points.

KRE vs XOVR: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureKREXOVR
Return
Total return, 1 year+21.2%−3.0%
Drawdown
Below its high6.9%, high on Aug 14, 20266.5%, high on Oct 5, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P Regional Banks Select Industry IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.35%1.81%
Net assets, KRE as of Oct 27, 2026 and XOVR as of Jun 30, 2026$4.2bn$2.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund11.6%63.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, KRE and XOVR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first KRE XOVR
Only in one fund ↓
Only in KRE
GLACIER BANCORP INC 1.20%
UNITED COMMUNITY BANKS 1.17%
BANK OZK 1.17%
COLUMBIA BANKING SYSTEM INC 1.17%
EASTERN BANKSHARES INC 1.16%
TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC 1.16%
UNITED BANKSHARES INC 1.16%
VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP 1.15%
Only in XOVR
N/A 17.73%
Nvidia Corp 9.47%
Astera Labs Inc 7.75%
Alphabet Inc 6.52%
Meta Platforms Inc 4.47%
Applovin Corp 3.95%
Natera Inc 3.70%
Robinhood Markets Inc 3.55%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

KRE State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
Issuer State Street ERShares
What it is Tracks the S&P Regional Banking Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +21.2% −3.0%
Expense ratio 0.35% 1.81%
Already in the S&P 500 6.6% 43.4%
Holdings 167 32
Net assets, KRE as of Oct 27, 2026 and XOVR as of Jun 30, 2026 $4.2bn $2.2bn

KRE and XOVR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

KRE flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
KRE

KRE tracks the S&P Regional Banking. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +21.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 7% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 167 positions, with the top ten at 11.6%. It sat 6.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XOVR

XOVR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 1.81% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 32 positions, with the top ten at 63.1%. It sat 6.5% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, KRE or XOVR?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, KRE returned +21.2% and XOVR −3.0%.
Which is cheaper, KRE or XOVR?
KRE is cheaper, by 1.46 percentage points a year. That is about $146 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do KRE and XOVR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 7% of KRE and 43% of XOVR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, KRE against XOVR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/kre-vs-xovr

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.