Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

KRE vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, KRE returned +21.2% to MAGS's +5.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about KRE and MAGS

Net assets: $4.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF, and $5.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.

At a glance
+21.2%
KRE total return, 1 year
+5.8%
MAGS total return, 1 year
0.35%
KRE expense ratio
0.30%
MAGS expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MAGS costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 15.4 points; MAGS is 1.3 times larger.

KRE vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureKREMAGS
Return
Total return, 1 year+21.2%+5.8%
Drawdown
Below its high6.9%, high on Aug 14, 20264.1%, high on Oct 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P Regional Banks Select Industry IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.35%0.30%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$4.2bn$5.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund11.6%29.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, KRE and MAGS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first KRE MAGS
Only in one fund ↓
Only in KRE
GLACIER BANCORP INC 1.20%
UNITED COMMUNITY BANKS 1.17%
BANK OZK 1.17%
COLUMBIA BANKING SYSTEM INC 1.17%
EASTERN BANKSHARES INC 1.16%
TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC 1.16%
UNITED BANKSHARES INC 1.16%
VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP 1.15%
Only in MAGS
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 6.83%
NVIDIA Corp 3.52%
Apple Inc 3.49%
Amazon.com Inc 3.48%
Tesla Inc 3.45%
Microsoft Corp 3.07%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.04%
Alphabet Inc 2.45%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

KRE State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the S&P Regional Banking Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +21.2% +5.8%
Expense ratio 0.35% 0.30%
Already in the S&P 500 6.6% 22.5%
Holdings 167 8
Net assets, KRE as of Oct 27, 2026 and MAGS as of Oct 28, 2026 $4.2bn $5.5bn

KRE and MAGS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

KRE and MAGS flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
KRE

KRE tracks the S&P Regional Banking. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +21.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 7% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 167 positions, with the top ten at 11.6%. It sat 6.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MAGS

MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Oct 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, KRE or MAGS?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, KRE returned +21.2% and MAGS +5.8%.
Which is cheaper, KRE or MAGS?
MAGS is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do KRE and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 7% of KRE and 22% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, KRE against MAGS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/kre-vs-mags

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.