JPST vs VRIG: Differences, Returns & Fees

JPST's duration was 0.8 years on May 31, 2026 and VRIG's 0.3 on Jul 31, 2026; JPST charges 0.18% to VRIG's 0.30%. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $42.8bn for JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF and $1.9bn for Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about JPST and VRIG

Answers cite the figures on this page.

JPST costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.9 points; JPST is far larger, $42.8bn against $1.9bn.

JPST vs VRIG: Differences, Returns & Fees
JPSTVRIG
Expense ratio0.18%0.30%
Net assets$42.8bn$1.9bn
Total return, 1 year+3.4%+4.3%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Holdings in commonreport dates differ

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

+3.4%
JPST total return, 1 year
+4.3%
VRIG total return, 1 year
0.18%
JPST expense ratio
0.30%
VRIG expense ratio

Get JPST and VRIG fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-41A0A20AF3

JPST and VRIG are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Cost. JPST charges 0.18% of assets a year and VRIG 0.30%, a gap of 0.12 points.
  2. Size. JPST has $42.8bn in net assets and VRIG $1.9bn (Net assets); JPST is 22.5 times larger.
  3. What each follows (similar). Both follow No index, actively managed.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

On the same fields

JPST
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
VRIG
Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +3.4% +4.3%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.9% (AGG) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +5.4 pts vs AGG not measured
Expense ratio 0.18% 0.30%
Holdings 824 363
Net assets $42.8bn $1.9bn

JPST and VRIG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About JPST

JPST is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year.

About VRIG

VRIG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, JPST or VRIG?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, JPST returned +3.4% and VRIG +4.3%.
Which is cheaper, JPST or VRIG?
JPST is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, JPST against VRIG, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jpst-vs-vrig

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.