Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
JNK vs XOVR: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, JNK returned +1.7% to XOVR's −3.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about JNK and XOVR
Net assets: $5.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF, and $2.2bn on Jun 30, 2026 for ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF.
Pair scorecard
JNK costs 1.41 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.7 points.
| Measure | JNK | XOVR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +1.7% | −3.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 6.5%, high on Oct 5, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bloomberg High Yield Very Liquid Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.40% | 1.81% |
| Net assets, JNK as of Oct 27, 2026 and XOVR as of Jun 30, 2026 | $5.9bn | $2.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 43% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 63.1% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, JNK and XOVR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
JNK and XOVR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
JNK
JNK tracks the Bloomberg High Yield Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.7% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year.
XOVR
XOVR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 1.81% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 32 positions, with the top ten at 63.1%. It sat 6.5% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, JNK or XOVR?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, JNK returned +1.7% and XOVR −3.0%.
- Which is cheaper, JNK or XOVR?
- JNK is cheaper, by 1.41 percentage points a year. That is about $141 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, JNK against XOVR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jnk-vs-xovr
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). JNK against XOVR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jnk-vs-xovr
[JNK against XOVR (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jnk-vs-xovr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.