JNK vs SCYB: Differences, Returns & Fees
JNK's duration was 3.4 years on Jun 30, 2026 and SCYB's 3.0 on May 31, 2026; SCYB charges 0.03% to JNK's 0.40%. Net assets: $5.5bn on Oct 20, 2026 for State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF, and $2.5bn on May 31, 2026 for Schwab High Yield Bond ETF.
SCYB costs 0.37 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points; JNK is 9.5 times larger.
| JNK | SCYB | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.40% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, as of Feb 28, 2025 | $8.6bn | $909m |
| Total return, 1 year | +1.1% | +1.0% |
| What it tracks | Bloomberg High Yield Very Liquid Index | not read by ETFIQ |
| Holdings in common | 57% | |
| Below its high | 3.0%, high on Aug 25, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
JNK and SCYB are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. JNK follows Bloomberg High Yield Very Liquid Index and SCYB follows not read by ETFIQ.
- Cost. JNK charges 0.40% of assets a year and SCYB 0.03%, a gap of 0.37 points.
- Size. JNK has $8.6bn in net assets and SCYB $909m (net assets, as of Feb 28, 2025); JNK is 9.5 times larger.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, JNK and SCYB hold 57% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
half
57% in common
On the same fields
JNK and SCYB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About JNK
JNK tracks the Bloomberg High Yield Bond. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. It sat 3.0% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About SCYB
SCYB tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +1.0% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, JNK or SCYB?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, JNK returned +1.1% and SCYB +1.0%.
- Which is cheaper, JNK or SCYB?
- SCYB is cheaper, by 0.37 percentage points a year. That is about $37 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, JNK against SCYB, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jnk-vs-scyb
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). JNK against SCYB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jnk-vs-scyb
[JNK against SCYB (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jnk-vs-scyb)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.