Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

JNK vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, JNK returned +1.7% to PDBC's +55.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about JNK and PDBC

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $5.9bn for State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF and $8.0bn for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

At a glance
+1.7%
JNK total return, 1 year
+55.6%
PDBC total return, 1 year
0.40%
JNK expense ratio
0.59%
PDBC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

JNK costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 53.9 points; PDBC is 1.4 times larger.

JNK vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureJNKPDBC
Return
Total return, 1 year+1.7%+55.6%
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg High Yield Very Liquid IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.40%0.59%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$5.9bn$8.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, JNK and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first JNK PDBC
Only in one fund ↓
Only in JNK
1261229 BC LTD SR SECURED 144A 04/32 10 0.65%
MERIDIAN ARC HOLDCO LLC SR SECURED 144A 04/31 6.25 0.53%
QUIKRETE HOLDINGS INC SR SECURED 144A 03/32 6.375 0.46%
ECHOSTAR CORP SR SECURED 11/29 10.75 0.45%
SOFTBANK GROUP CORP SR UNSECURED 144A 04/32 9.25 0.44%
SOFTBANK GROUP CORP SR UNSECURED 144A 04/34 9.75 0.43%
PR RNO PROPERTY OWNER 1 SR SECURED 144A 05/31 6.5 0.42%
VENTURE GLOBAL LNG INC SR SECURED 144A 02/29 9.5 0.42%
Only in PDBC
POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 19.37%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

JNK State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Commodity ETF
What it is Tracks the Bloomberg High Yield Bond Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +1.7% +55.6%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) +54.6% (DBC)
Gap to its benchmark +3.1 pts vs AGG +1.0 pts vs DBC
Expense ratio 0.40% 0.59%
Holdings 1142 1
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $5.9bn $8.0bn

JNK and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

JNK and PDBC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
JNK

JNK tracks the Bloomberg High Yield Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.7% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year.

PDBC

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, JNK or PDBC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, JNK returned +1.7% and PDBC +55.6%.
Which is cheaper, JNK or PDBC?
JNK is cheaper, by 0.19 percentage points a year. That is about $19 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, JNK against PDBC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jnk-vs-pdbc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.