Which returned more over the last year, BWET or JNK?

In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5,121.7% and JNK +1.7%.

Which is cheaper, BWET or JNK?

JNK is cheaper, by 4.28 percentage points a year. That is about $428 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

BWET vs JNK: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

BWET is a commodity futures fund and JNK a bond index fund, and over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BWET returned +5,121.7% against +1.7%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BWET and JNK

Net assets: $178m on Oct 28, 2026 for Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF, and $5.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF.

BWET on its own →JNK on its own →

At a glance

+5,121.7%

BWET total return, 1 year

+1.7%

JNK total return, 1 year

4.68%

BWET expense ratio

0.40%

JNK expense ratio

Pair scorecard

JNK costs 4.28 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5120.0 points; JNK is far larger, $5.8bn against $186m.

BWET vs JNK: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	BWET	JNK
Return
Measure	BWET	JNK
Total return, 1 year	+5,121.7%	+1.7%
Drawdown
Measure	BWET	JNK
Below its high	11.2%, high on Oct 8, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	BWET	JNK
What it tracks	Tanker freight futures	Bloomberg High Yield Very Liquid Index
Cost and size
Measure	BWET	JNK
Expense ratio	4.68%	0.40%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026	$186m	$5.8bn
Holdings
Measure	BWET	JNK
Holdings in common	not published

Method

Side by side

BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF JNK State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF

Where it sits Commodity ETF Bond ETF

Issuer Breakwave State Street

What it is Holds tanker freight futures Tracks the Bloomberg High Yield Bond

Total return, 1 year +5,121.7% +1.7%

Its benchmark over the same days not measured −1.4% (AGG)

Gap to its benchmark not measured +3.1 pts vs AGG

Expense ratio 4.68% 0.40%

Holdings not counted 1142

Net assets, BWET as of Oct 28, 2026 and JNK as of Oct 27, 2026 $178m $5.9bn

BWET and JNK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

BWET

Its expense ratio is 4.68%, for the year to Jun 30, 2026, as its 10-K states.

BWET holds tanker freight futures. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5,121.7% with distributions reinvested. It sat 11.2% below its high of Oct 8, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

JNK

JNK tracks the Bloomberg High Yield Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.7% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BWET or JNK?: In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5,121.7% and JNK +1.7%.
Which is cheaper, BWET or JNK?: JNK is cheaper, by 4.28 percentage points a year. That is about $428 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's own filings.

Other comparisons

BWET vs HYG BWET vs USHY BWET vs EDV BWET vs VUSB JNK vs USO JNK vs SIVR JNK vs SLV GLDM vs JNK

Where to next

BWET on its own →JNK on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →JNK dividend history →JNK holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

Breakwave page for BWET ↗

JNK filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

JNK prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

State Street website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BWET against JNK, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bwet-vs-jnk

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.