JMBS vs JMTG: Differences, Returns & Fees
JMBS's duration was 6.2 years on Jul 31, 2026 and JMTG's 5.6 on May 31, 2026; JMBS charges 0.21% to JMTG's 0.24%. Net assets: $6.7bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF, and $6.7bn on Oct 9, 2026 for JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF.
JMBS costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.0 point.
| JMBS | JMTG | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.21% | 0.24% |
| Net assets, JMBS as of Jul 31, 2026 and JMTG as of Oct 9, 2026 | $6.7bn | $6.7bn |
| Total return, 1 year | −1.8% | −0.8% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Below its high | 5.4%, high on Feb 27, 2026 | 4.3%, high on Feb 27, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, JMBS and JMTG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
On the same fields
JMBS and JMTG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
JMBS in plain words
JMBS is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. It sat 5.4% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −1.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.6% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index.
JMTG in plain words
JMTG is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. It sat 4.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. MBS Index.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, JMBS or JMTG?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, JMBS returned −1.8% and JMTG −0.8%.
- Which is cheaper, JMBS or JMTG?
- JMBS is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, JMBS against JMTG, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jmbs-vs-jmtg
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). JMBS against JMTG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jmbs-vs-jmtg
[JMBS against JMTG (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jmbs-vs-jmtg)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.