JHCR vs TAGG: Differences, Returns & Fees
JHCR's duration was 6.0 years on Jun 30, 2026 and TAGG's 5.8 on Jul 31, 2026; TAGG charges 0.08% to JHCR's 0.29%. Net assets: $2.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for John Hancock Core Bond ETF, and $2.7bn on Oct 9, 2026 for T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond ETF.
TAGG costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.3 points; TAGG is far larger, $1.8bn against $18m.
| JHCR | TAGG | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.29% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, as of Jan 31, 2026 | $18m | $1.8bn |
| Total return, 1 year | −1.7% | −1.4% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 6% | |
| Below its high | 4.4%, high on Feb 27, 2026 | 4.5%, high on Feb 27, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, JHCR and TAGG hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
6% in common
On the same fields
JHCR and TAGG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
JHCR in plain words
JHCR is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. It sat 4.4% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −1.7% with distributions reinvested, against −1.6% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index.
TAGG in plain words
TAGG is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. It sat 4.5% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.6% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, JHCR or TAGG?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, JHCR returned −1.7% and TAGG −1.4%.
- Which is cheaper, JHCR or TAGG?
- TAGG is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. That is about $21 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, JHCR against TAGG, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jhcr-vs-tagg
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). JHCR against TAGG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jhcr-vs-tagg
[JHCR against TAGG (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jhcr-vs-tagg)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.