Which returned more over the last year, JCPB or UBND?

In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, JCPB returned −0.8% and UBND −1.0%.

Which is cheaper, JCPB or UBND?

JCPB is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

JCPB vs UBND: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

JCPB's duration was 5.9 years on Aug 31, 2026 and UBND's 5.6 on Jun 30, 2026; JCPB charges 0.37% to UBND's 0.40%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about JCPB and UBND

Net assets: $17.4bn on Oct 28, 2026 for JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF, and $1.9bn on Jun 30, 2026 for VictoryShares Core Plus Bond ETF.

JCPB on its own →UBND on its own →

At a glance

−0.8%

JCPB total return, 1 year

−1.0%

UBND total return, 1 year

0.37%

JCPB expense ratio

0.40%

UBND expense ratio

Pair scorecard

JCPB costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points.

JCPB vs UBND: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	JCPB	UBND
Return
Measure	JCPB	UBND
Total return, 1 year	−0.8%	−1.0%
Benchmark
Measure	JCPB	UBND
What it tracks	No index, actively managed	No index, actively managed
Cost and size
Measure	JCPB	UBND
Expense ratio	0.37%	0.40%
Net assets, JCPB as of Oct 28, 2026 and UBND as of Jun 30, 2026	$17.4bn	$1.9bn
Holdings
Measure	JCPB	UBND
Holdings in common	3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 15, 2021 to Oct 23, 2026 · 262 weekly returns

JCPB UBND

Return

Total return edge JCPB +3.3% +2.9%

Annualized edge JCPB (slight) +0.6% +0.6%

Price return edge UBND (slight) −16.8% −16.4%

Risk

Volatility edge Tie 5.7% 5.7%

Max drawdown edge Tie −16.3% −16.3%

Risk-adjusted

Sharpe edge Tie −0.55 −0.56

Sortino edge UBND (slight) −0.74 −0.72

Calmar edge JCPB (slight) 0.04 0.04

Reading

JCPB returned more: +3.3% to +2.9%. JCPB and UBND swung about the same: 5.7% and 5.7%. JCPB and UBND fell about the same at their worst: −16.3% and −16.3%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓

Risk and return: JCPB vs UBND: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	JCPB	UBND	Edge	How it is measured
Return
Total return	+3.3%	+2.9%	JCPB	Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized	+0.6%	+0.6%	JCPB (slight)	Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return	−16.8%	−16.4%	UBND (slight)	Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility	5.7%	5.7%	Tie	Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation	4.2%	4.4%	JCPB (slight)	Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown	−16.3%	−16.3%	Tie	Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe	−0.55	−0.56	Tie	Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino	−0.74	−0.72	UBND (slight)	Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar	0.04	0.04	JCPB (slight)	Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 262 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, JCPB and UBND hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

3% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first JCPB UBND

U.S. Treasury Bonds, due Aug 15, 2045 0.91% 0.60%

FNMA UMBS, 30 Year, due Dec 1, 2052 0.20% 0.16%

U.S. Treasury Bonds, due Nov 15, 2053 0.45% 0.15%

U.S. Treasury Bonds, due May 15, 2055 0.17% 0.15%

GNMA II, 30 Year, due Jul 20, 2052 0.13% 0.19%

U.S. Treasury Notes, due Feb 15, 2035 0.11% 0.23%

U.S. Treasury Bonds, due Nov 15, 2040 0.13% 0.08%

FNMA ACES, Series 2022-M2, Class A2, due Nov 25, 2031 0.11% 0.08%

Meta Platforms, Inc., due Nov 15, 2055 0.07% 0.08%

Imperial Brands Finance plc, due Jul 1, 2035 0.09% 0.06%

Credit Acceptance Auto Loan Trust, Series 2026-1A, Class C, due Aug 15, 2036 0.09% 0.06%

Charter Communications Operating LLC, due Dec 1, 2035 0.07% 0.05%

Only in one fund ↓

Only in JCPB

U.S. Treasury Notes, due Aug 31, 2029 2.68%

FNMA/FHLMC UMBS, Single Family, 30 Year, due Sep 25, 2056 1.39%

FNMA/FHLMC UMBS, Single Family, 30 Year, due Sep 25, 2056 1.26%

FNMA/FHLMC UMBS, Single Family, 30 Year, due Sep 25, 2056 1.13%

U.S. Treasury Notes, due Nov 15, 2035 1.06%

U.S. Treasury Bonds, due Nov 15, 2054 0.76%

U.S. Treasury Bonds, due Nov 15, 2052 0.73%

U.S. Treasury Notes, due Nov 15, 2034 0.66%

Only in UBND

U S TREASURY BONDS, due Nov 15, 2039 2.23%

U S TREASURY BOND, due May 15, 2037 1.85%

U S TREASURY NOTE, due May 15, 2033 1.43%

U S TREASURY NOTE, due Feb 15, 2036 1.19%

U S TREASURY BONDS, due Feb 15, 2036 1.07%

U S TREASURY NOTE, due May 15, 2035 1.01%

U S TREASURY NOTE, due Aug 15, 2035 0.90%

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, due Nov 1, 2055 0.89%

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

JCPB JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF UBND VictoryShares Core Plus Bond ETF

Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF

Issuer JPMorgan VictoryShares

What it is Actively managed Actively managed

Total return, 1 year −0.8% −1.0%

Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) not measured

Gap to its benchmark +0.6 pts vs AGG not measured

Expense ratio 0.37% 0.40%

Holdings 2819 1529

Net assets, JCPB as of Oct 28, 2026 and UBND as of Jun 30, 2026 $17.4bn $1.9bn

JCPB and UBND on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-B8FCA7C16F

JCPB and UBND are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

Holdings in common. 3% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026).
What each follows (similar). Both follow No index, actively managed.
One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 JCPB returned −0.8% and UBND −1.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.2 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

About each fund

JCPB

JCPB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year.

UBND

UBND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, JCPB or UBND?: In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, JCPB returned −0.8% and UBND −1.0%.
Which is cheaper, JCPB or UBND?: JCPB is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

JCPB vs SYSB JCPB vs SMTH EVTR vs JCPB BOND vs JCPB EVTR vs UBND FBND vs UBND CGCP vs UBND BOND vs UBND

Where to next

JCPB on its own →UBND on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →JCPB dividend history →JCPB holdings →UBND dividend history →UBND holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

JCPB filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

JCPB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

JPMorgan website ↗

UBND filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

UBND prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, JCPB against UBND, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jcpb-vs-ubnd

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.