Which returned more over the last year, CGCP or UBND?

In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGCP returned −1.4% and UBND −1.0%.

Which is cheaper, CGCP or UBND?

CGCP is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

CGCP vs UBND: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

On Jun 30, 2026 CGCP's duration was 6.1 years and UBND's 5.6; CGCP charges 0.34% to UBND's 0.40%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGCP and UBND

Net assets: $8.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF, and $1.9bn on Jun 30, 2026 for VictoryShares Core Plus Bond ETF.

CGCP on its own →UBND on its own →

At a glance

−1.4%

CGCP total return, 1 year

−1.0%

UBND total return, 1 year

0.34%

CGCP expense ratio

0.40%

UBND expense ratio

Pair scorecard

CGCP costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.4 points.

CGCP vs UBND: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	CGCP	UBND
Return
Measure	CGCP	UBND
Total return, 1 year	−1.4%	−1.0%
Benchmark
Measure	CGCP	UBND
What it tracks	No index, actively managed	No index, actively managed
Cost and size
Measure	CGCP	UBND
Expense ratio	0.34%	0.40%
Net assets, CGCP as of Oct 27, 2026 and UBND as of Jun 30, 2026	$8.6bn	$1.9bn
Holdings
Measure	CGCP	UBND
Holdings in common	4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 242 weekly returns

CGCP UBND

Return

Total return edge UBND +4.8% +6.8%

Annualized edge UBND +1.0% +1.4%

Price return edge UBND −15.7% −12.9%

Risk

Volatility edge UBND (slight) 5.9% 5.8%

Max drawdown edge UBND (slight) −14.0% −13.1%

Risk-adjusted

Sharpe edge UBND −0.51 −0.45

Sortino edge UBND −0.69 −0.59

Calmar edge UBND 0.07 0.11

Reading

UBND returned more: +6.8% to +4.8%. UBND swung slightly less: 5.8% to 5.9%. UBND fell slightly less at its worst: −13.1% to −14.0%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓

Risk and return: CGCP vs UBND: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	CGCP	UBND	Edge	How it is measured
Return
Total return	+4.8%	+6.8%	UBND	Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized	+1.0%	+1.4%	UBND	Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return	−15.7%	−12.9%	UBND	Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility	5.9%	5.8%	UBND (slight)	Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation	4.4%	4.5%	CGCP (slight)	Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown	−14.0%	−13.1%	UBND (slight)	Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe	−0.51	−0.45	UBND	Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino	−0.69	−0.59	UBND	Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar	0.07	0.11	UBND	Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 242 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, CGCP and UBND hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

4% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGCP UBND

U.S. Treasury Bonds, due Feb 15, 2056 0.58% 0.76%

U.S. Treasury Bonds, due Feb 15, 2041 0.74% 0.52%

U.S. Treasury Bonds, due Aug 15, 2045 0.16% 0.60%

IRV Trust 2025-200P, due Mar 14, 2047 0.15% 0.24%

U.S. Treasury Bonds, due Feb 15, 2055 0.34% 0.15%

U.S. Treasury Bonds, due May 15, 2055 0.72% 0.15%

BFLD Commercial Mortgage Trust 2025-5MW, due Oct 10, 2042 0.18% 0.15%

U.S. Treasury Bonds, due Nov 15, 2044 0.70% 0.12%

Coty Inc/HFC Prestige Products Inc/HFC Prestige International US LLC, due Jan 15, 2031 0.15% 0.09%

U.S. Treasury Bonds, due Nov 15, 2040 0.17% 0.08%

Meta Platforms Inc, due Nov 15, 2055 0.12% 0.08%

BX Trust 2025-VOLT, due Dec 15, 2044 0.24% 0.08%

Only in one fund ↓

Only in CGCP

Capital Group Central Cash Fund 8.34%

U.S. Treasury Bonds, due May 15, 2046 4.35%

U.S. Treasury Notes, due Jan 31, 2028 3.27%

Uniform Mortgage-Backed Security, TBA, due Jul 1, 2056 2.01%

U.S. Treasury Bonds, due May 15, 2041 1.73%

U.S. Treasury Notes, due Jan 31, 2031 1.63%

U.S. Treasury Bonds, due May 15, 2056 1.59%

U.S. Treasury Notes, due Apr 30, 2028 1.58%

Only in UBND

U S TREASURY BONDS, due Nov 15, 2039 2.23%

U S TREASURY BOND, due May 15, 2037 1.85%

U S TREASURY NOTE, due May 15, 2033 1.43%

U S TREASURY NOTE, due Feb 15, 2036 1.19%

U S TREASURY BONDS, due Feb 15, 2036 1.07%

U S TREASURY NOTE, due May 15, 2035 1.01%

U S TREASURY NOTE, due Aug 15, 2035 0.90%

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, due Nov 1, 2055 0.89%

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CGCP Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF UBND VictoryShares Core Plus Bond ETF

Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF

Issuer Capital Group VictoryShares

What it is Actively managed Actively managed

Total return, 1 year −1.4% −1.0%

Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) not measured

Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs AGG not measured

Expense ratio 0.34% 0.40%

Holdings 1464 1529

Net assets, CGCP as of Oct 27, 2026 and UBND as of Jun 30, 2026 $8.6bn $1.9bn

CGCP and UBND on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-2D62BA8D06

CGCP and UBND are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

Holdings in common. 4% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026).
What each follows (similar). Both follow No index, actively managed.
One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGCP returned −1.4% and UBND −1.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.4 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

About each fund

CGCP

CGCP is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.34% a year.

UBND

UBND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGCP or UBND?: In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGCP returned −1.4% and UBND −1.0%.
Which is cheaper, CGCP or UBND?: CGCP is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

CGCP vs GTO CGCP vs SYSB CGCP vs SMTH CGCP vs FIXD UBND vs VPLS PTRB vs UBND EVTR vs UBND JCPB vs UBND

Where to next

CGCP on its own →UBND on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →CGCP dividend history →CGCP holdings →UBND dividend history →UBND holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

CGCP filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

CGCP prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Capital Group page for CGCP ↗

UBND filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

UBND prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGCP against UBND, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgcp-vs-ubnd

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.