JBND vs JHCR: Differences, Returns & Fees
JBND's duration was 6.2 years on May 31, 2026 and JHCR's 6.0 on Jun 30, 2026; JBND charges 0.25% to JHCR's 0.29%. Net assets: $8.9bn on Oct 9, 2026 for JPMorgan Active Bond ETF, and $2.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for John Hancock Core Bond ETF.
JBND costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.6 points.
| JBND | JHCR | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.29% |
| Net assets, JBND as of Oct 9, 2026 and JHCR as of Jun 30, 2026 | $8.9bn | $2.3bn |
| Total return, 1 year | −1.1% | −1.7% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 1% | |
| Below its high | 4.2%, high on Feb 27, 2026 | 4.4%, high on Feb 27, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, JBND and JHCR hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
half
1% in common
On the same fields
JBND and JHCR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
JBND in plain words
JBND is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 4.2% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −1.1% with distributions reinvested, against −1.6% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index.
JHCR in plain words
JHCR is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. It sat 4.4% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −1.7% with distributions reinvested, against −1.6% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, JBND or JHCR?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, JBND returned −1.1% and JHCR −1.7%.
- Which is cheaper, JBND or JHCR?
- JBND is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, JBND against JHCR, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jbnd-vs-jhcr
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). JBND against JHCR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jbnd-vs-jhcr
[JBND against JHCR (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jbnd-vs-jhcr)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.