Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IYM vs VAW: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IYM returned +25.8% to VAW's +14.0%; 63% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IYM and VAW

Net assets: $1.3bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF, and $3.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Materials ETF.

At a glance
+25.8%
IYM total return, 1 year
+14.0%
VAW total return, 1 year
0.37%
IYM expense ratio
0.09%
VAW expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VAW costs 0.28 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.8 points; VAW is 2.4 times larger.

IYM vs VAW: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIYMVAW
Return
Total return, 1 year+25.8%+14.0%
Drawdown
Below its high7.0%, high on Aug 25, 20265.8%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 1000 Basic Materials RIC 22MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Materials 25/50
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.37%0.09%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$1.3bn$3.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common63%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund68.6%57.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Feb 6, 2004 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,185 weekly returns
IYM VAW
Return
Total return edge VAW +504.0% +589.0%
Annualized edge VAW (slight) +8.2% +8.8%
Price return edge VAW +304.9% +350.3%
Risk
Volatility edge VAW (slight) 24.3% 22.8%
Max drawdown edge VAW (slight) −66.1% −61.8%
Downside capture 105.5% 100.1%
Beta 1.13 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VAW (slight) 0.37 0.41
Sortino edge VAW (slight) 0.53 0.58
Treynor 0.081 0.083
Calmar edge VAW 0.12 0.14
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.3% a year 0.0% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.11 0.14
Information ratio 0.09 0.03
Tracking error 14.3% 0.7%

Each against its own benchmark: IYM against IWB, Jun 30, 2000 to Oct 23, 2026; VAW against FMAT, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

VAW returned more: +589.0% to +504.0%. VAW swung slightly less: 22.8% to 24.3%. VAW fell slightly less at its worst: −61.8% to −66.1%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IYM vs VAW: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIYMVAWEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+504.0%+589.0%VAWPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+8.2%+8.8%VAW (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+304.9%+350.3%VAWPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility24.3%22.8%VAW (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation17.1%15.9%VAW (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−66.1%−61.8%VAW (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture111.5%100.4%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture105.5%100.1%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.131.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.671.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.370.41VAW (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.530.58VAW (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0810.083Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.120.14VAWAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWBFMATThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.3% a year0.0% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.110.14Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−5.1% to +5.7%−0.4% to +0.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.090.03Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error14.3%0.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,185 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

63%

By the books each fund has filed, IYM and VAW hold 63% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

63% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IYM VAW
LINDE PLC 20.59% 15.25%
NEWMONT 10.47% 8.47%
FREEPORT MCMORAN INC 8.35% 6.99%
ECOLAB 6.46% 4.83%
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS 4.84% 4.03%
NUCOR 4.48% 3.60%
STEEL DYNAMICS INC 3.12% 2.11%
INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES 2.46% 1.44%
ROYAL GOLD 2.10% 1.39%
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM 2.27% 1.36%
COEUR MINING 1.51% 1.26%
CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS INC 1.90% 1.23%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IYM
FASTENAL 4.46%
ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI PLC 3.33%
SOUTHERN COPPER CORP 1.87%
RBC BEARINGS 1.55%
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY 1.44%
MUELLER INDUSTRIES INC 1.23%
TIMKEN 0.75%
HEXCEL 0.61%
Only in VAW
Sherwin-Williams Co 5.12%
CRH PLC 3.84%
Vulcan Materials Co 2.20%
Martin Marietta Materials Inc 2.00%
PPG Industries Inc 1.61%
Smurfit Westrock PLC 1.61%
Packaging Corp of America 1.42%
Dow Inc 1.38%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IYM iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF VAW Vanguard Materials ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +25.8% +14.0%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.1% (IWB) +13.9% (FMAT)
Gap to its benchmark +12.7 pts vs IWB +0.1 pts vs FMAT
Expense ratio 0.37% 0.09%
Already in the S&P 500 73.1% 75.0%
Holdings 41 112
Net assets, IYM as of Oct 27, 2026 and VAW as of Sep 30, 2026 $1.3bn $3.1bn

IYM and VAW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-24C9EC0704

IYM and VAW are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. IYM follows Russell 1000 Basic Materials RIC 22 and VAW follows MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Materials 25/50.
  2. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IYM returned +25.8% and VAW +14.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 11.8 points.
  3. Cost. IYM charges 0.37% of assets a year and VAW 0.09%, a gap of 0.28 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IYM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IYM

IYM tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 73% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 41 positions, with the top ten at 68.6%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VAW

VAW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.0% with distributions reinvested, against +13.9% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Materials 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 75% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 112 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%. It sat 5.8% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IYM or VAW?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IYM returned +25.8% and VAW +14.0%.
Which is cheaper, IYM or VAW?
VAW is cheaper, by 0.28 percentage points a year. That is about $28 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IYM and VAW overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 73% of IYM and 75% of VAW by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IYM against VAW, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iym-vs-vaw

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.