Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWO vs RSP: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWO returned +7.9% to RSP's +16.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWO and RSP

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $14.0bn for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF and $99.8bn for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF.

At a glance
+7.9%
IWO total return, 1 year
+16.0%
RSP total return, 1 year
0.24%
IWO expense ratio
0.20%
RSP expense ratio

Pair scorecard

RSP costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.1 points; RSP is 7.1 times larger.

IWO vs RSP: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWORSP
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.9%+16.0%
Drawdown
Below its high9.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 2000 Growth IndexS&P 500 Equal Weight Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.24%0.20%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$14.0bn$99.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund6.4%2.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IWO and RSP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWO RSP
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWO
JFROG 0.74%
TWIST BIOSCIENCE 0.71%
GLAUKOS 0.70%
MOOG INC CLASS A 0.68%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.66%
10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.61%
RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.60%
INTERDIGITAL INC 0.58%
Only in RSP
Moderna Inc 0.30%
PTC Inc 0.30%
Everpure Inc 0.28%
Illumina Inc 0.27%
Accenture PLC 0.27%
Hasbro Inc 0.26%
Mettler-Toledo International Inc 0.26%
Revvity Inc 0.26%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 2000 Growth Tracks the S&P 500 equal weight
Total return, 1 year +7.9% +16.0%
Its benchmark over the same days +8.0% (VTWG) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VTWG +2.3 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.24% 0.20%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 99.8%
Holdings 1122 508
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $14.0bn $99.8bn

IWO and RSP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IWO and RSP flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWO

IWO tracks the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.9% with distributions reinvested, against +8.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,122 positions, with the top ten at 6.4%. It sat 9.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

RSP

RSP tracks the S&P 500 equal weight. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.0% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 508 positions, with the top ten at 2.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWO or RSP?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWO returned +7.9% and RSP +16.0%.
Which is cheaper, IWO or RSP?
RSP is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWO and RSP overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IWO and 100% of RSP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWO against RSP, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwo-vs-rsp

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.