Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWM vs SPSM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWM returned +14.1% to SPSM's +17.6%; 48% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWM and SPSM

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $75.5bn for iShares Russell 2000 ETF and $16.0bn for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF.

At a glance
+14.1%
IWM total return, 1 year
+17.6%
SPSM total return, 1 year
0.19%
IWM expense ratio
0.03%
SPSM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SPSM costs 0.16 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.5 points; IWM is 4.7 times larger.

IWM vs SPSM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWMSPSM
Return
Total return, 1 year+14.1%+17.6%
Drawdown
Below its high7.6%, high on Aug 14, 20266.7%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 2000 IndexS&P SmallCap 600 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.19%0.03%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$75.5bn$16.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common48%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund3.3%5.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jul 19, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 692 weekly returns
IWM SPSM
Return
Total return edge SPSM (slight) +213.6% +222.7%
Annualized edge SPSM (slight) +9.0% +9.2%
Price return edge IWM (slight) +164.4% +158.2%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 21.2% 21.2%
Max drawdown edge IWM (slight) −40.2% −41.9%
Downside capture 100.5% 100.3%
Beta 1.01 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SPSM (slight) 0.42 0.43
Sortino edge SPSM (slight) 0.61 0.63
Treynor 0.106 0.091
Calmar edge Tie 0.22 0.22
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.1% a year −0.5% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.36 −0.73
Information ratio −0.02 −0.20
Tracking error 1.0% 2.4%

Each against its own benchmark: IWM against VTWO, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026; SPSM against IJR, Jul 19, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

SPSM returned slightly more: +222.7% to +213.6%. IWM and SPSM swung about the same: 21.2% and 21.2%. IWM fell slightly less at its worst: −40.2% to −41.9%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IWM vs SPSM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWMSPSMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+213.6%+222.7%SPSM (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+9.0%+9.2%SPSM (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+164.4%+158.2%IWM (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility21.2%21.2%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.7%14.6%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−40.2%−41.9%IWM (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture101.0%99.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.5%100.3%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.011.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.000.99Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.420.43SPSM (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.610.63SPSM (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1060.091Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.220.22TieAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVTWOIJRThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.1% a year−0.5% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.36−0.73Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.6% to +0.4%−1.8% to +0.8%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.02−0.20Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.0%2.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 692 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

48%

By the books each fund has filed, IWM and SPSM hold 48% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

48% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWM SPSM
GLAUKOS 0.35% 0.61%
SM ENERGY 0.32% 0.53%
RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.30% 0.52%
VIASAT INC 0.30% 0.56%
JACKSON FINANCIAL CLASS A 0.29% 0.48%
PROTAGONIST THERAPEUTICS 0.29% 0.52%
TG THERAPEUTICS 0.27% 0.46%
ALKERMES 0.25% 0.43%
ZURN ELKAY WATER SOLUTIONS CORP 0.25% 0.41%
FEDERAL SIGNAL CORP 0.24% 0.41%
MACERICH REIT 0.24% 0.39%
MATSON INC 0.24% 0.40%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWM
JFROG 0.37%
TWIST BIOSCIENCE 0.35%
MOOG INC CLASS A 0.34%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.33%
UMB FINANCIAL 0.33%
10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.31%
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC 0.29%
CARETRUST REIT 0.29%
Only in SPSM
PAYCOM SOFTWARE INC 0.58%
MATCH GROUP INC 0.57%
ELEMENT SOLUTIONS INC 0.46%
RALLIANT CORP 0.44%
CARMAX INC 0.44%
EASTMAN CHEMICAL CO 0.43%
ETSY INC 0.43%
LAMB WESTON HOLDINGS INC 0.42%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF SPSM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 2000 Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +14.1% +17.6%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (VTWO) +17.5% (IJR)
Gap to its benchmark −0.2 pts vs VTWO +0.1 pts vs IJR
Expense ratio 0.19% 0.03%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 1977 609
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $75.5bn $16.0bn

IWM and SPSM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-FC84CD002D

IWM and SPSM are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. IWM follows Russell 2000 Index and SPSM follows S&P SmallCap 600 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 48% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IWM returned +14.1% and SPSM +17.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 3.5 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IWM and SPSM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWM

IWM tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,977 positions, with the top ten at 3.3%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SPSM

SPSM tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for its benchmark, the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 609 positions, with the top ten at 5.3%. It sat 6.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWM or SPSM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWM returned +14.1% and SPSM +17.6%.
Which is cheaper, IWM or SPSM?
SPSM is cheaper, by 0.16 percentage points a year. That is about $16 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWM and SPSM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IWM and 0% of SPSM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWM against SPSM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwm-vs-spsm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.