Which returned more over the last year, IWM or SIVR?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWM returned +21.2% and SIVR returned +54.2%, so SIVR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, IWM or SIVR?

IWM charges 0.19% a year and SIVR charges 0.45%, so IWM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWM vs SIVR: how they differ

IWM is an equity index fund and SIVR a commodity fund, and over the year SIVR returned more, +54.2% against +21.2%.

iShares Russell 2000 ETF and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF.

IWM and SIVR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	abrdn
What it is	Russell 2000	Physical Silver
Total return, 1 year	+21.2%	+54.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+3.7 pts	+36.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.19%	0.45%
Holdings	1749	not filed

IWM in plain words

IWM is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1749 positions, with the top ten at 3.2%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SIVR in plain words

SIVR is a commodity fund tracking the Physical Silver. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +54.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.45% a year. It sat 44.9% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWM or SIVR?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWM returned +21.2% and SIVR returned +54.2%, so SIVR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWM or SIVR?: IWM charges 0.19% a year and SIVR charges 0.45%, so IWM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWM against SIVR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWM against SIVR, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwm-vs-sivr Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources