Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWM vs REMX: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWM returned +14.1% to REMX's −19.2%, and IWM charges 0.19% to REMX's 0.53%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWM and REMX
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $75.5bn for iShares Russell 2000 ETF and $1.5bn for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF.
Pair scorecard
IWM costs 0.34 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 33.3 points; IWM is far larger, $75.5bn against $1.5bn.
| Measure | IWM | REMX |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +14.1% | −19.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 7.6%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | |
| Below its all-time high | 75.1%, high on Apr 11, 2011 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell 2000 Index | Rare earth and critical materials |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 32.6 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.19% | 0.53% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $75.5bn | $1.5bn |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 3.3% | 61% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWM and REMX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWM and REMX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWM
IWM tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,977 positions, with the top ten at 3.3%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
REMX
By weight, 9% of REMX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 32 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −19.2% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 32.6 pts. It sits 75.1% below its all-time high of Apr 11, 2011.
Questions people ask
- Are IWM and REMX in the same category?
- IWM is a stock ETF and REMX is a thematic ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, IWM or REMX?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWM returned +14.1% and REMX −19.2%.
- Which is cheaper, IWM or REMX?
- IWM is cheaper, by 0.34 percentage points a year. That is about $34 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWM against REMX, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwm-vs-remx
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWM against REMX. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwm-vs-remx
[IWM against REMX (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwm-vs-remx)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.