Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWM vs LYTE: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

IWM and LYTE are measured over different days, and IWM charges 0.19% to LYTE's 0.65%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWM and LYTE

Net assets: $75.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 2000 ETF, and $165m on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF.

At a glance
+14.1%
IWM total return, 1 year
−19.6%
LYTE total return, since launch, Aug 6, 2026
0.19%
IWM expense ratio
0.65%
LYTE expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IWM costs 0.46 points a year less; IWM is far larger, $75.5bn against $163m.

IWM vs LYTE: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWMLYTE
Return
Total return, 1 year+14.1%not published
Drawdown
Below its high7.6%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Below its all-time high28.5%, high on Aug 17, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 2000 IndexPhotonics and optics
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.19%0.65%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$75.5bn$163m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund3.3%

Method

Side by side

IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF LYTE Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Thematic ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 2000 Photonics and optics
Total return, 1 year +14.1% −19.6% (since launch, Aug 6, 2026)
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (VTWO) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −0.2 pts vs VTWO not measured
Expense ratio 0.19% 0.65%
Holdings 1977 not yet filed
Net assets, IWM as of Oct 27, 2026 and LYTE as of Oct 28, 2026 $75.5bn $165m

IWM and LYTE on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IWM and LYTE flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWM

IWM tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,977 positions, with the top ten at 3.3%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

LYTE

LYTE has no public holdings filing captured yet. Since it first traded on Aug 6, 2026 the fund returned −19.6% with distributions reinvested. It sits 28.5% below its all-time high of Aug 17, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are IWM and LYTE in the same category?
IWM is a stock ETF and LYTE is a thematic ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which is cheaper, IWM or LYTE?
IWM is cheaper, by 0.46 percentage points a year. That is about $46 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWM against LYTE, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwm-vs-lyte

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.