Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWM vs IWN: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWM returned +14.1% to IWN's +21.1%; 55% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWM and IWN

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $75.5bn for iShares Russell 2000 ETF and $14.0bn for iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF.

At a glance
+14.1%
IWM total return, 1 year
+21.1%
IWN total return, 1 year
0.19%
IWM expense ratio
0.24%
IWN expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IWM costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.0 points; IWM is 5.4 times larger.

IWM vs IWN: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWMIWN
Return
Total return, 1 year+14.1%+21.1%
Drawdown
Below its high7.6%, high on Aug 14, 20265.2%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 2000 IndexRussell 2000 Value Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.19%0.24%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$75.5bn$14.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common55%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund3.3%5.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Aug 4, 2000 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,368 weekly returns
IWM IWN
Return
Total return edge IWN +671.2% +894.7%
Annualized edge IWN +8.1% +9.1%
Price return edge IWN +449.3% +506.3%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 22.3% 22.2%
Max drawdown edge IWM (slight) −57.7% −60.6%
Downside capture 100.5% 100.2%
Beta 1.01 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge IWN 0.38 0.42
Sortino edge IWN 0.54 0.61
Treynor 0.106 0.102
Calmar edge IWN (slight) 0.14 0.15
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.1% a year −0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.36 −0.09
Information ratio −0.02 −0.01
Tracking error 1.0% 2.3%

Each against its own benchmark: IWM against VTWO, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026; IWN against VTWV, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

IWN returned more: +894.7% to +671.2%. IWM and IWN swung about the same: 22.3% and 22.2%. IWM fell slightly less at its worst: −57.7% to −60.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: IWM vs IWN: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWMIWNEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+671.2%+894.7%IWNPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+8.1%+9.1%IWNTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+449.3%+506.3%IWNPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility22.3%22.2%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.7%15.5%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−57.7%−60.6%IWM (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture101.0%100.2%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.5%100.2%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.011.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.000.99Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.380.42IWNReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.540.61IWNReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1060.102Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.140.15IWN (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVTWOVTWVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.1% a year−0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.36−0.09Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.6% to +0.4%−1.2% to +1.1%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.02−0.01Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.0%2.3%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,368 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

55%

By the books each fund has filed, IWM and IWN hold 55% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

55% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWM IWN
UMB FINANCIAL 0.33% 0.61%
SM ENERGY 0.32% 0.60%
VIASAT INC 0.30% 0.60%
CARETRUST REIT 0.29% 0.58%
JACKSON FINANCIAL CLASS A 0.29% 0.59%
OLD NATIONAL BANCORP 0.29% 0.52%
CYTOKINETICS 0.28% 0.49%
COMMERCIAL METALS 0.24% 0.40%
MACERICH REIT 0.24% 0.47%
MATSON INC 0.24% 0.47%
PBF ENERGY CLASS A 0.24% 0.49%
LIFE TIME GROUP HOLDINGS 0.23% 0.43%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWM
JFROG 0.37%
GLAUKOS 0.35%
TWIST BIOSCIENCE 0.35%
MOOG INC CLASS A 0.34%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.33%
10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.31%
RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 0.30%
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC 0.29%
Only in IWN
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 2000 Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +14.1% +21.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (VTWO) +21.3% (VTWV)
Gap to its benchmark −0.2 pts vs VTWO −0.2 pts vs VTWV
Expense ratio 0.19% 0.24%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 1977 1405
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $75.5bn $14.0bn

IWM and IWN on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-66BF539874

IWM and IWN do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. IWM follows Russell 2000 Index and IWN follows Russell 2000 Value Index.
  2. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IWM returned +14.1% and IWN +21.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 7.0 points.
  3. Size. IWM has $75.5bn in net assets and IWN $14.0bn (net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026); IWM is 5.4 times larger.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

IWM and IWN flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWM

IWM tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,977 positions, with the top ten at 3.3%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IWN

IWN tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +21.1% with distributions reinvested, against +21.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Value Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,405 positions, with the top ten at 5.4%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWM or IWN?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWM returned +14.1% and IWN +21.1%.
Which is cheaper, IWM or IWN?
IWM is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWM and IWN overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IWM and 0% of IWN by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWM against IWN, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwm-vs-iwn

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.