Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWF vs XLC: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWF returned +0.9% to XLC's −10.4%; 15% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWF and XLC
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $124.7bn for iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF and $22.1bn for State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF.
Pair scorecard
XLC costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.3 points; IWF is 5.6 times larger.
| Measure | IWF | XLC |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +0.9% | −10.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 13.3%, high on Jan 30, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Growth Index | Communication Services Select Sector Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $124.7bn | $22.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 15% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.5% | 75.3% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Jun 29, 2018 to Oct 23, 2026 · 434 weekly returnsIWF returned more: +253.8% to +131.1%. XLC swung slightly less: 20.0% to 21.1%. IWF fell less at its worst: −32.5% to −45.9%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | IWF | XLC | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +253.8% | +131.1% | IWF | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +16.3% | +10.6% | IWF | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +232.7% | +113.0% | IWF | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 21.1% | 20.0% | XLC (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 14.2% | 14.0% | Tie | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −32.5% | −45.9% | IWF | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.69 | 0.46 | IWF | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.03 | 0.66 | IWF | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.50 | 0.23 | IWF | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 434 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWF and XLC hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
15% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWF and XLC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWF and XLC do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. IWF follows Russell 1000 Growth Index and XLC follows Communication Services Select Sector Index.
- Holdings in common. 15% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IWF returned +0.9% and XLC −10.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 11.3 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
IWF
IWF tracks the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +0.9% with distributions reinvested, against +1.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 374 positions, with the top ten at 57.5%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
XLC
XLC tracks an index of Communication services. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −10.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 23 positions, with the top ten at 75.3%. It sat 13.3% below its high of Jan 30, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWF or XLC?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWF returned +0.9% and XLC −10.4%.
- Which is cheaper, IWF or XLC?
- XLC is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWF against XLC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-xlc
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWF against XLC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-xlc
[IWF against XLC (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwf-vs-xlc)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.