Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

QQQ vs XLC: how they differ

QQQ and XLC hold 13% of their weight in the same names, and QQQ returned more over the year.

Invesco QQQ Trust and State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QQQ and XLC hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QQQ and XLC both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQQQXLC
Alphabet Inc3.12%10.12%
Meta Platforms Inc3.07%18.92%
Alphabet Inc2.90%8.10%
Netflix Inc1.42%4.57%
T-Mobile US Inc0.85%4.52%
AppLovin Corp0.43%1.34%
Comcast Corp0.40%4.61%
Warner Bros Discovery Inc0.31%4.61%
Take-Two Interactive Software Inc0.18%3.89%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QQQOnly in XLC
NVIDIA Corp 8.52%AT+T INC 5.19%
Apple Inc 7.72%VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC 5.03%
Microsoft Corp 5.89%WALT DISNEY CO/THE 4.76%
Micron Technology Inc 4.90%LIVE NATION ENTERTAINMENT IN 4.13%
Amazon.com Inc 4.36%OMNICOM GROUP 4.13%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.65%CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS INC A 2.93%
Tesla Inc 2.92%FOX CORP CLASS A 2.37%
Broadcom Inc 2.75%ECHOSTAR CORP A 2.28%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

QQQ and XLC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust
XLC
State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoState Street
What it isNasdaq-100Communication services
Total return, 1 year+23.0%−2.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.5 pts−19.5 pts
Expense ratio0.18%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%100.0%
Holdings10526

QQQ in plain words

QQQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 47.0%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLC in plain words

XLC is an index equity fund tracking the Communication services. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 26 positions, with the top ten at 70.4%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Jan 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QQQ or XLC?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQ returned +23.0% and XLC returned −2.0%, so QQQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, QQQ or XLC?
QQQ charges 0.18% a year and XLC charges 0.08%, so XLC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QQQ and XLC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of QQQ and 100% of XLC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QQQ against XLC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQ against XLC, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qqq-vs-xlc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources