Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IWC vs XLF: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWC returned +16.5% to XLF's +7.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWC and XLF
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $1.2bn for iShares Micro-Cap ETF and $51.6bn for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF.
Pair scorecard
XLF costs 0.52 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.9 points; XLF is far larger, $51.6bn against $1.2bn.
| Measure | IWC | XLF |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +16.5% | +7.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 9.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | 3.8%, high on Sep 3, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell Microcap Index | Financial Select Sector Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $1.2bn | $51.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 5.9% | 57.4% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWC and XLF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWC and XLF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
IWC tracks the Russell Microcap. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,365 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 9.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
XLF
XLF tracks an index of Financials. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 57.4%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWC or XLF?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWC returned +16.5% and XLF +7.6%.
- Which is cheaper, IWC or XLF?
- XLF is cheaper, by 0.52 percentage points a year. That is about $52 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWC against XLF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwc-vs-xlf
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IWC against XLF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwc-vs-xlf
[IWC against XLF (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwc-vs-xlf)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.